Thanks for the updates. Yes, rsync's included zlib isn't compatible with
system zlib. However, since you are not using the -z option, I don't think
that's the issue.
Can you try rsync-bpc 3.1.2.1? It has more testing than 3.1.3.beta0.
Craig
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 7:43 PM wrote:
> Upgrading
Upgrading to the latest rsync-bpc 3.1.3 fixed the problem with
specials.
And restores all seemed to work last night, until I tried dumps today.
Now all my scheduled backups fail with error message:
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(226)
[Receiver=3.1.3.beta0]
Jeff,
I did set the policy to permissive. If I get some time I'll try again.
Craig
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 10:30 PM wrote:
> Thanks Craig.
> The --specials now works (and I agree with both you and Michael that
> it is not useful... but it validates that the restore is 'perfect' as
> far as rs
On 2020-05-23 23:47, backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Regarding your comment:
However, I don't think it makes sense to
"fix" it, since a backup shouldn't add metadata that changes each time
you
backup some data that hasn't changed.
Actually, the whole point of --ignore-dir-times is that the dir