The incremental-recursion algorithm would be a huge win for a lot of our
backups, in particular for doing backups of larger mail servers that have
MailDir as the store. Is there any plan for migrating that in?
David.
-
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Hendrik Friedel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone tr
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Adam Goryachev wrote:
>> Does anyone have a workaround or fix for this? Is it possible to change
>> BackupPC so it doesn't remove the in-progress file, but instead copies it
>> into
>> the pool so rsync will pick up where it left off last time? There doesn't
>> seem
>> to
The --partial option seems like it would do the trick.
Can anyone comment as to how hard it would be to put it into File::RsyncP?
David.
-
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
> David Birnbaum wrote:
>
>>>
>>> One approach is to use a VPN connection to the r
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I've been using BackupPC for several years now, but one problem that I've
>> never come up with a good answer for is when a single large file is too big
>> to transfer completely in the time the backup can run before timing out.
>> For example, a 10M l
Greetings,
I've been using BackupPC for several years now, but one problem that I've never
come up with a good answer for is when a single large file is too big to
transfer completely in the time the backup can run before timing out. For
example, a 10M local datafile, backing up over a 768k up