The tools I've seen that use GitHub for development also use its issue
tracker. I've seen very little in the way of complaints about it. For
larger feature development the team might prefer something like
Trello.com or Asana.com, but issues seem to be good for many things.
- Iain.
On 23 May 2016
Crucially, though, the copyright remains with the coder, not the Linux
Foundation. It's an important distinction when it comes to someone trying
to change the licence, because if a foundation owns it, they can license as
they want, while if it's owned by all the contributors, you'd have to get
thei
The contributor certificate of origin from the Linux process linked
earlier in the thread seems sensible and a basic level for what would
be needed. They require a shorthand at the end of every patch which
signifies that the contributor is asserting the contents of the
certificate:
http://git.kern