Mark Sopuch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to group data (let's just say dept data) from certain hosts
> together (or actually to seperate some from others) to a different
> filesystem and still keep the deduping pool in a common filesystem.
> Problem is that hard links would break in doing this
Keith Edmunds wrote:
> My understanding is that when BackupPC is doing an incremental backup via
> rsync, only the files that have changed attributes since the last full
> backup are examined.
>
> I have a backup running on a client that has just over 100,000 files
> using 24Gb, and monitoring with
Jesús Martel wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Jesús Martel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 16-may-2007 22:32
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental backup and SMB protocol
> don't work correctly
> To: Holger Parplies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> I don't understand. If the file
Markus Mehrwald wrote:
> I found the problem. No user is not allowed but Windows accepts the user
> "gast" or on english systems it may be "guest". Obviously backuppc passes ""
> as username and this is not allowed.
>
>
This has actually been discussed before and if you want a little more
bac
Ok, now that I know how to view log files from the command line (guess I
should check the bin dir first from now on :-), it looks like when a
partial backup is saved, it only contains individual shares that were
actually backed up completely. I have a server with four separate
partitions that
Is there any way to tell the status of an on-going rsync backup?
Ideally, I'd like to see how many file have been backed up, how many are
left, how many were skipped because they're already there, etc. I know
this is possible with the command line rsync via the --progress option,
but I'm not
MrE wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just discovered BackupPC after a long search for a backup
> solution that will cater for both my Linux boxes, my girlfriend's
> Windows XP box (and perhaps later this year an Apple Macbook for her),
> while providing a single user interface regardless of platform.
>
Adrien RAVISE wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have install your great solution !
> I have a probleme with the incremental copy with smclient.
>
> When I create a new directory with some files on a share , i start a
> manuel incremental copy after.
> Finaly, just the directory is backup, the files are no pr
Hi all,
I was just happening to look at the log file for the system and noticed
that it is FULL of lines like these:
2007-05-02 01:00:12 dhcp 192.168.0.50: sh: -c: line 0: syntax error near
unexpected token `0x933d2b8'
2007-05-02 01:00:12 dhcp 192.168.0.50: sh: -c: line 0: `ARRAY(0x933d2b8)'
20
Matt Godbolt wrote:
>
>
> Matt Godbolt wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've just installed BackupPC at my company having happily used it at
>> home for some time. In both locations it's used in a mixed OS
>> environment, but at work we've decided to use SMB shares to read from
>> everyone's PCs for e
Hi all,
I'm having a problem with my backup system that just showed up today.
When doing a backup, the whole thing seems to just stall for no reason.
While watching top, I noticed that the system is idle and BackupPC_dump
is nowhere on the list of active processes. This will last for several
Holger Parplies wrote:
>
> that is correct *only for rsync type transport* (meaning rsync or rsyncd).
> Actually not "because they exist in the pool", but rather "because they were
> the same in the host's previous backup". If you rename a file, it will be
> transfered but not written to disk on th
Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jason M. Kusar wrote on 30.04.2007 at 17:13:06 [[BackupPC-users] Filling
> Backups]:
>
>> I'm currently using BackupPC to back up our network. However, I have
>> one server that has over a terrabyte of data. I am currently ru
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jason M. Kusar wrote:
>
>>> If you use rsync as the transport you never actually transfer
>>> unchanged files again - you only make a pass over the files
>>> comparing block checksums. This takes some time/cpu at each end but
>>>
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jason M. Kusar wrote:
>
>> I'm currently using BackupPC to back up our network. However, I have
>> one server that has over a terrabyte of data. I am currently running a
>> full backup that has been running since Friday morning. I have
Hi all,
I'm currently using BackupPC to back up our network. However, I have
one server that has over a terrabyte of data. I am currently running a
full backup that has been running since Friday morning. I have no idea
how much more it has to go.
My question is if there is a way to avoid ev
16 matches
Mail list logo
