> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:40 AM
> To: List Receiver
> Cc: Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom; backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync fulls complete, but incremental
incrementals
> don't
>
> On 10/22 08:22 , List Receiver wrote:
> > > On 10/19 03:53 , List Receiver wrote:
> > > > Putting that hosts timeout at 300ms? Where is that defined? I
> see
> > > only
> > > > one timeout in BackupPC, and it
incrementals
> don't
>
> On 10/19 03:53 , List Receiver wrote:
> > Putting that hosts timeout at 300ms? Where is that defined? I see
> only
> > one timeout in BackupPC, and it appears to be globally applied to all
> > transport methods. Am I missing something obv
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 4:12 PM
> To: List Receiver
> Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync fulls complete, but incrementals
> don'
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 9:02 PM
> To: List Receiver
> Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync fulls complete, but incrementals
> don't
>
&g
: List Receiver; backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync fulls complete, but incrementals don't
i have found that the default timeout will not work over even a fast WAN. i
have an MPLS network with ping times averaging about 180ms and i could not get
a rel
I've got a BackupPC 3.0 system in place that is backing up a couple dozen
hosts. Most of the hosts are Windows boxes running Rsyncd, and they backup
just fine. One of my hosts, however, can't seem to complete an incremental run
for the life of it. A full run completes, but takes a long time t
