clint woodrow wrote:
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>> Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
>>
>> > clint woodrow wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Matthias Meyer wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
>> > > > (http://www.samba.or
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
>
> > clint woodrow wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Matthias Meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
> > > > (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst a
Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
> clint woodrow wrote:
> >
> > Matthias Meyer wrote:
> >> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
> >> (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive
> >> one new mail at sunday. rsync will o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs
> RSYNCD]:
>> Can I also take from this that BackupPC won't be storing full copies for
>> every backup?
> No
Hi,
clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs
RSYNCD]:
> Matthias Meyer wrote:
> > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync).
> > e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will
> > o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
clint woodrow wrote:
>
> Matthias Meyer wrote:
>> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
>> (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive
>> one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new mail.
>>
>>
>> A
Matthias Meyer wrote:
> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync).
> e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will
> only transmit this one new mail.
>
> And you need a client on windows side. You can use cwRsync or rsync within a
> cy
Robert J. Phillips wrote:
> When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen
> with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the
> process to use vshadow and rsyncd.
>
>
>
> I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use
> vshadow and
When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen
with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the
process to use vshadow and rsyncd.
I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use
vshadow and SMB.
What are the advantages/disadvan
I have looked for info on this but need a confirmation on some questions
I have. I was using SMB for backing up a few XP machines and switched to
Rsyncd on one of them. In looking at the backups there are some
differences.
First SMB. When I look at a SMB backup (full or incremental) I see what
10 matches
Mail list logo