Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-08 Thread Matthias Meyer
clint woodrow wrote: > > > Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: >> Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: >> >> > clint woodrow wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > Matthias Meyer wrote: >> > > >> > > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file >> > > > (http://www.samba.or

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-04 Thread clint woodrow
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: > Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: > > > clint woodrow wrote: > > > > > > > > Matthias Meyer wrote: > > > > > > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file > > > > (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst a

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: > clint woodrow wrote: > > > > Matthias Meyer wrote: > >> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file > >> (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive > >> one new mail at sunday. rsync will o

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Holger Parplies wrote: > Hi, > > clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs > RSYNCD]: >> Can I also take from this that BackupPC won't be storing full copies for >> every backup? > No

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD]: > Matthias Meyer wrote: > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). > > e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will > > o

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 clint woodrow wrote: > > Matthias Meyer wrote: >> rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file >> (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive >> one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new mail. >> >> >> A

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread clint woodrow
Matthias Meyer wrote: > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). > e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will > only transmit this one new mail. > > And you need a client on windows side. You can use cwRsync or rsync within a > cy

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-05-15 Thread Matthias Meyer
Robert J. Phillips wrote: > When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen > with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the > process to use vshadow and rsyncd. > > > > I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use > vshadow and

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-05-15 Thread Robert J. Phillips
When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the process to use vshadow and rsyncd. I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use vshadow and SMB. What are the advantages/disadvan

[BackupPC-users] SMB Vs Rsyncd restores and filling data

2008-11-23 Thread Eric Snyder
I have looked for info on this but need a confirmation on some questions I have. I was using SMB for backing up a few XP machines and switched to Rsyncd on one of them. In looking at the backups there are some differences. First SMB. When I look at a SMB backup (full or incremental) I see what