Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 05:56:30 -0500 on Monday, November 3, 2008: Craig Barratt wrote at about 18:06:43 -0700 on Friday, October 31, 2008: Jeff writes: Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the rsync checksum seed and which ones don't???

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Craig Barratt wrote at about 18:06:43 -0700 on Friday, October 31, 2008: Jeff writes: Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the rsync checksum seed and which ones don't??? I'm relucant to even say, because you are heading in an unproductive direction.

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Holger Parplies wrote at about 00:52:47 +0100 on Saturday, November 1, 2008: Hi, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-31 15:26:58 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?]: Les Mikesell wrote

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:16:05PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: I must be missing something on this whole compression, pooling, and checksum matter. I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same checksum (one is _0) but 'cmp' to different values. However, when I zcat them, they have

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Hi, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 23:16:05 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?]: [...] I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same checksum (one is _0) but 'cmp' to different values. However

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Holger Parplies wrote at about 12:25:08 +0100 on Friday, October 31, 2008: Hi, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 23:16:05 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?]: [...] I found 2 files in my

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Tino Schwarze wrote at about 12:20:50 +0100 on Friday, October 31, 2008: On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:16:05PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: I must be missing something on this whole compression, pooling, and checksum matter. I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the rsync checksum seed and which ones don't??? I think you are kind of missing the point that they could both be corrupted in other ways... -- Les Mikesell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:27:20 -0500 on Friday, October 31, 2008: Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the rsync checksum seed and which ones don't??? I think you are kind of missing the point that they could both be

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Hi, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-31 15:26:58 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?]: Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:27:20 -0500 on Friday, October 31, 2008: Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote

Re: [BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

Jeff writes: Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the rsync checksum seed and which ones don't??? I'm relucant to even say, because you are heading in an unproductive direction. But here goes: a compressed file without checksums starts with 0x78 and a compressed

[BackupPC-users] 2 cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same zcatt'ed content?????

I must be missing something on this whole compression, pooling, and checksum matter. I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same checksum (one is _0) but 'cmp' to different values. However, when I zcat them, they have the same value. I thought that (lossless) compression was a 1-1 mapping?