On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, dan wrote:
> i have to agree on the "off-topic" comment be untrue as it directly effects
> the performance of the backuppc system. general system tweak or not.
>
> i see that comment a lot. 'nfs is off topic', 'this or that filesystem is
> off topic', etc etc. None if it is
i have to agree on the "off-topic" comment be untrue as it directly effects
the performance of the backuppc system. general system tweak or not.
i see that comment a lot. 'nfs is off topic', 'this or that filesystem is
off topic', etc etc. None if it is off topic. anything that directly
improv
On Nov 6, 2007 7:35 AM, Paul Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I mount my /backup raid with noatime and notail options.
> >
> Don't forget nodiratime.
nodiratime is a subset of noatime, so if you have noatime set, there
is no need to set nodiratime.
-Dave
stephen wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Paul Fox wrote:
>
> > this is perfect wiki fodder, i'd say...
>
> Yes and no. It's more correctly classified as a general system performance
> tweak rather than something BackupPC specific. At best it belongs in the
> off-topic area.
i think you're s
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Paul Fox wrote:
> this is perfect wiki fodder, i'd say...
Yes and no. It's more correctly classified as a general system performance
tweak rather than something BackupPC specific. At best it belongs in the
off-topic area.
4:19pm, Toni Van Remortel wrote:
> Paul Archer wrote:
>> Looks like a good tip. Unfortunately, since I'm running a reiserfs
>> filesystem on Linux, it doesn't help me directly. But it does bring up a
>> good point: does anyone know of any filesystem tweaks for reiserfs that
>> might bring similar
Paul Archer wrote:
> Looks like a good tip. Unfortunately, since I'm running a reiserfs
> filesystem on Linux, it doesn't help me directly. But it does bring up a
> good point: does anyone know of any filesystem tweaks for reiserfs that
> might bring similar improvements in this situation of acc
Looks like a good tip. Unfortunately, since I'm running a reiserfs
filesystem on Linux, it doesn't help me directly. But it does bring up a
good point: does anyone know of any filesystem tweaks for reiserfs that
might bring similar improvements in this situation of accessing millions of
small f
this is perfect wiki fodder, i'd say...
=-
paul fox, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (arlington, ma, where it's 46.4 degrees)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find pr
I'm posting this to the list so people searching for FreeBSD
optimizations will find it in the archives.
I finally got around to looking at why my FreeBSD server was only
backing up at about 2.5MB/sec using tar with clients with lots of small
files.
Using my desktop (a Mac PRO) as the test
10 matches
Mail list logo
