Tim writes:
> Is there a reason why archives made with "-1" as the backup number are
> saved as "-1" instead of the actual backup number that was used? If
> not, would you accept a patch that changes it to use the actual backup
> number instead (assuming I can figure out how to make the change
Hello!
In digging into the archive system, I have a question:
Is there a reason why archives made with "-1" as the backup number are
saved as "-1" instead of the actual backup number that was used? If
not, would you accept a patch that changes it to use the actual backup
number instead (assum
