Hello Holger and Les,
Holger Parplies a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> [can we agree on avoiding tabs in subject lines?]
>
> Les Mikesell wrote on 2009-09-25 23:25:35 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing
> up a BackupPC host - *using rsync+tarPCCopy*]:
>> Fernando Laudares Camargos
Hi,
[can we agree on avoiding tabs in subject lines?]
Les Mikesell wrote on 2009-09-25 23:25:35 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing
up a BackupPC host - *using rsync+tarPCCopy*]:
> Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
> > [...]
> > I'm doing two things (altough I'm
Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
>
>> Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
>>> * Why BackupPC_tarPCCopy sometimes produces big tar files ? *
>> Are you doing something to control the timing of your copies compared to
>> the changes backuppc would be making? The files in cpool need to be
>> exa
Hello Jeffrey,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky a écrit :
> I have written a program BackupPC_fixLinks.pl that will go through
> both your pool and pc chain to find (and fix) duplicate pool files and
> missing links. Part of the fix is to run an equivalent to
> BackupPC_Link on missing/broken links.
>
> Note
Hi Les,
Les Mikesell a écrit :
> Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
>>
>> * Why BackupPC_tarPCCopy sometimes produces big tar files ? *
>
> Are you doing something to control the timing of your copies compared to
> the changes backuppc would be making? The files in cpool need to be
> exactl
It might be nice if some of the repair tools you guys create were
shipped as part of the whole package, maybe even accessible through
"Admin Options" ...
just a suggestion.
steve
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
wrote:
> I have written a program BackupPC_fixLinks.pl that wi
I have written a program BackupPC_fixLinks.pl that will go through
both your pool and pc chain to find (and fix) duplicate pool files and
missing links. Part of the fix is to run an equivalent to
BackupPC_Link on missing/broken links.
Note you can't just run BackupPC_Link (or its analog) unless yo
Fernando Laudares Camargos wrote:
>
>
> * Why BackupPC_tarPCCopy sometimes produces big tar files ? *
Are you doing something to control the timing of your copies compared to
the changes backuppc would be making? The files in cpool need to be
exactly in sync with the directory snapshots ma
Hello,
I beg your pardon for bringing this topic to the table again. I have read this
entire thread (even the scientific debate around thrusting probabilities
calculus) and have tried the main suggestions detailed by you to solve this
problem (except the use of raid mirror detailed by Les Mikes
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:15:56PM -0400, Peter Walter wrote:
> All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
> backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
> sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
> dire
Peter Walter wrote:
> Les,
>
> All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
> backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
> sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
> directory change monitor based upon the Linux ke
Les,
All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
directory change monitor based upon the Linux kernel inotify() facility,
such
Peter Walter wrote:
> I checked the cpool directory on my server and it contained 803,023
> files in the directory tree. If rsync is not a scaleable solution for
> backing up a backuppc pool over the internet, does anyone have a
> suggestion for a better solution?
What matters more is how many
I checked the cpool directory on my server and it contained 803,023
files in the directory tree. If rsync is not a scaleable solution for
backing up a backuppc pool over the internet, does anyone have a
suggestion for a better solution?
Peter
Les Mikesell wrote:
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>> Is there a problem with my approach?
>
> The problem with rsync'ing a backuppc data pool is the sheer number of
> files. you'll run your machine out of space with the lists as they get
> loaded into memory.
>
> up to a certain point it will work; and with newer
On 03/09 06:03 , David Lasker wrote:
> Is there a problem with my approach?
The problem with rsync'ing a backuppc data pool is the sheer number of
files. you'll run your machine out of space with the lists as they get
loaded into memory.
up to a certain point it will work; and with newer versions
ort
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Backing up a BackupPc host
Peter Walter wrote:
> All,
>
> I have implemented backuppc on a Linux server in my mixed OSX / Windows
> / Linux environment for several months now, and I am very happy with the
> results. For additional disaster recover
Peter Walter wrote:
> All,
>
> I have implemented backuppc on a Linux server in my mixed OSX / Windows
> / Linux environment for several months now, and I am very happy with the
> results. For additional disaster recovery protection, I am considering
> implementing an off-site backup of the back
All,
I have implemented backuppc on a Linux server in my mixed OSX / Windows
/ Linux environment for several months now, and I am very happy with the
results. For additional disaster recovery protection, I am considering
implementing an off-site backup of the backuppc server using rsync to
syn
19 matches
Mail list logo
