Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup time consumption.

2009-05-11 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Oblivian wrote: > Hello list, > > We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04 > for quite some time now. However, April 15th, we upgraded BacupPC from > 3.0.0 to 3.2.0 (on Ubuntu 8.10) and see a major increase in backup ti

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup time consumption.

2009-05-11 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, Adam Goryachev wrote on 2009-05-11 22:55:34 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup?time consumption.]: > Oblivian wrote: > > We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04 > > for quite some time now.

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup time consumption.

2009-05-11 Thread mark k
I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1, which means it will backup all changed data since the last full. Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that possibly a large amount of data changed. So taking a full should address that issue. If you are going to keep taking incrementals,

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup time consumption.

2009-05-11 Thread oblivian
Thanks Adam, Holger and Mark. Sometimes the obvious is too obvious... well, for some at least. =/ Oblivian mark k wrote: I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1, which means it will backup all changed data since the last full. Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that poss

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup time consumption.

2009-05-12 Thread dan
Oblivion, did running a full backup fix the performance issue? On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM, oblivian wrote: > Thanks Adam, Holger and Mark. > > Sometimes the obvious is too obvious... well, for some at least. > > =/ > > Oblivian > > > mark k wrote: > > I believe this has to do with incre