Oblivion, did running a full backup fix the performance issue?
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 12:49 PM, oblivian wrote:
> Thanks Adam, Holger and Mark.
>
> Sometimes the obvious is too obvious... well, for some at least.
>
> =/
>
> Oblivian
>
>
> mark k wrote:
>
> I believe this has to do with incre
Thanks Adam, Holger and Mark.
Sometimes the obvious is too obvious... well, for some at least.
=/
Oblivian
mark k wrote:
I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1,
which means it will backup all changed data since the last full.
Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that poss
I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1,
which means it will backup all changed data since the last full.
Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that possibly a large amount of data
changed. So taking a full should address that issue. If you are going
to keep taking incrementals,
Hi,
Adam Goryachev wrote on 2009-05-11 22:55:34 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
BackupPC 3.0.0 -> 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup?time consumption.]:
> Oblivian wrote:
> > We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04
> > for quite some time now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oblivian wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04
> for quite some time now. However, April 15th, we upgraded BacupPC from
> 3.0.0 to 3.2.0 (on Ubuntu 8.10) and see a major increase in backup ti
