On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 08:43, Olivier LAHAYE wrote:
> Your solution is working well and it is similar to my current configuration
> (all laptop are syncing their D drive to the home dir of the user that owns
> the laptop on a Filer:user work saved).
> The problem is that due to multiple instances o
Your solution is working well and it is similar to my current configuration
(all laptop are syncing their D drive to the home dir of the user that owns
the laptop on a Filer:user work saved).
The problem is that due to multiple instances of the same file on the server,
we run out of space (80 la
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 05:20, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Second, you didn't say that backing up the clients would annoy the users.
> > Now it's an issue?
> YES and this is a big YES: Why? because user never want backup (privately or
> at work). and there are many reasons for that. Privately, the
Les,
As I read your answer, I see that the solution I proposed is far from being
easily doable (eventhough it look sexy) with the current release of BackupPC.
But maybe BackupPC could be enhanced to be able to have a slave.
I mean: during the nightly job, new files are identified.
For such fil
> First off - calm down. This is a voluntary list.
Sorry, maybe you missunderstood me, I'm not upset in anyway and I'm very calm.
I'm just trying to propose solutions that could help BackuPC beeing seen as a
realy wonderfull solution. As for your comment, please discuss privately
before shouting
Olivier,
First off - calm down. This is a voluntary list.
Second, you didn't say that backing up the clients would annoy the users. Now
it's an issue ? Perhaps the users of those machines who have previously lost
data due to a poor (or no) backup regime would be more than happy to be backed
up to
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 09:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> then each night we to an "rsync-2.6.6 -H" (on /var/lib/backuppc/pc) between
> the 2 sites.
First, whether this is practical or not depends on the number of files
with hard links that rsync has to traverse. The technique used to
find the ma
Le Mardi 23 Août 2005 16:30, Damian O'Hara a écrit :
> Hi Olivier,
>
> I know that another Motorola site in the UK has a backup server (not
> backuppc :o) on each site that backs up both site's hosts. So all six
> clients are: backed up by both backuppc servers.
Yes I know those sites but I think
Hi Olivier,
I know that another Motorola site in the UK has a backup server (not backuppc
:o) on each site that backs up both site's hosts. So all six clients are backed
up by both backuppc servers.
If your network is not a problem you could adopt that aproach. That way you
could recover any host
Does this Disaster recovery safe cluster architecture possible with BackupPC?
Let say we have 2 sites A and B
Let says that we have 3 hosts per site to backup
hosts 1A 2A 3A for site A and 1B 2B 3B for site B.
If we declare hosts 1A 2A 3A plus hosts 1B 2B 3B as archive hosts on site A
and at th
10 matches
Mail list logo
