Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>>> I do the shutdown for two reasons:
>>>
>>> 1) My system partition lives on the raid as well as the data, so I have
>>> to shut down to keep everything consistent.
>>> 2) My sata controller doesn't recognize hot swaps as far
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> I do the shutdown for two reasons:
>>
>> 1) My system partition lives on the raid as well as the data, so I have
>> to shut down to keep everything consistent.
>> 2) My sata controller doesn't recognize hot swaps as far as I have been
>> able to det
Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>>> My filesystem is raid 1 (via md) with 3 disks. Two of the disks are
>>> internal and one is in an sata hot-swap enclosure. Whenever I want to
>>> take a backup offsite, I shut down the machine, pull the third drive,
>>> replace it with a new one, and start it back up. T
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
>> My filesystem is raid 1 (via md) with 3 disks. Two of the disks are
>> internal and one is in an sata hot-swap enclosure. Whenever I want to
>> take a backup offsite, I shut down the machine, pull the third drive,
>> replace it with a new one, and
Thanks everybody for the answers, now I think I've got the point.
And about
2009/11/20 Christian Völker :
> or RAID10). Just wondering why you have a backup if s single disk fail
> destroys it all...
Well, the "master" external USB disk was a quick solution to patch a
totally lack of client back
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Alexander Fortin wrote:
>> What do you suggest as a physical storage architecture with an off-site
>> weekly clone? Maybe RAID1 with 2 disks as master and a spare one, to
>> synchronize now and then? Or maybe is better something like a RAID1 with
>> 2 disks and then some (r
Alexander Fortin wrote:
> What do you suggest as a physical storage architecture with an off-site
> weekly clone? Maybe RAID1 with 2 disks as master and a spare one, to
> synchronize now and then? Or maybe is better something like a RAID1 with
> 2 disks and then some (r)sync tool to get the clon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRBD
Oh yes, I tried this as well. Works only if your connection to the
remote site is fast enough. Otherwise you'd need to purchase the drdb
proxy for some hundred bucks.
And additionally: drdb is not a backup, it'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRBD
2009/11/20 Christian Völker :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a clone of the
>> pool directory, because I want to do an off-site copy now and then.
> Welcome. This is one of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a clone of the
> pool directory, because I want to do an off-site copy now and then.
Welcome. This is one of the most discussed topics in this list...
> What do you suggest as a physical
Hi everybody. I've been using BackupPC for more then 1 year here in
office for my small business and this is the very first post on this ML,
and that because I'm very happy with the product: so far I had no
problem at all, nor today.
I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a cl
11 matches
Mail list logo
