John Rouillard wrote at about 20:13:15 + on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:04:26AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30,
2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30
I have found a number of files in my pool that have the same checksum
(other than a trailing _0 or _1) and also the SAME CONTENT. Each copy
has a few links to it by the way.
Why is this happening?
Isn't this against the whole theory of pooling. It also doesn't seem
to get cleaned up by
Hi Jeffrey,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:55:16AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I have found a number of files in my pool that have the same checksum
(other than a trailing _0 or _1) and also the SAME CONTENT. Each copy
has a few links to it by the way.
That's intentional - what are the
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 03:55:16 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM and same CONTENTS]:
I have found a number of files in my pool that have the same checksum
(other than a trailing _0 or _1) and also the SAME CONTENT. Each copy
has a few
Hi,
Tino Schwarze wrote on 2008-10-30 11:13:27 +0100 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM and same CONTENTS]:
[...]
Hm. I just took a look in my cpool and found some files which didn't
hit the hardlink count yet, but have a _0 and _1:
.../cpool/0/0 # ls -l
Hi Holger,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 12:11:43PM +0100, Holger Parplies wrote:
I'm not sure though, how the file name is derived,
It's in the docs. Up to 256 KB of file contents (from the first 1 MB) and the
file length are taken into account, so it's quite easy to produce hash clashes
if
Apropos link count, I just did a quick check of my pool. Here are the
top linked files:
-rw-r- 987537 backuppc users 359 2007-05-19 23:43
./0/d/1/0d16a8f0ce1b516044a3f015b7d5ee06
-rw-r- 437446 backuppc users 98 2007-02-07 03:21
./b/c/8/bc891581e99fb3729ea3d239a52d2b9a
-rw-r- 340062
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 11:13:27 +0100 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Hi Jeffrey,
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:55:16AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I have found a number of files in my pool that have the same checksum
(other than a trailing _0 or _1) and also the SAME
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 03:55:16 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM and same CONTENTS]:
I have found a number of files in my pool that have the same
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:56:15AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I'm not sure though, how the file name is derived, I found another file
with same name but different MD5 sum:
.../cpool/0/0 # md5sum 8/0084734e7242df0fbc186ba6741d1bab*
db224998946bac7859f2448f41c58f88
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 15:08:29 +0100 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 09:56:15AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I'm not sure though, how the file name is derived, I found another file
with same name but different MD5 sum:
.../cpool/0/0 # md5sum
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 03:55:16 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM and same
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 10:04:26 -0400 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 03:55:16 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM
Jeffrey writes:
Except that it my case some of the duplicated checksums truly are the
same file (probably due to the link issue I am having)...
Yes. Just as Holger mentions, if the hardlink attempt fails,
a new file is created in the pool. You appear to have some
unreliability in your NFS or
Craig Barratt wrote at about 11:27:41 -0700 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
Jeffrey writes:
Except that it my case some of the duplicated checksums truly are the
same file (probably due to the link issue I am having)...
Yes. Just as Holger mentions, if the hardlink attempt fails,
John Rouillard wrote at about 20:13:15 + on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:04:26AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30,
2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 20:26:35 -0400 on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
John Rouillard wrote at about 20:13:15 + on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:04:26AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday,
Hi,
[could we agree on a subject line without tabs? ;-]
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 20:31:15 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Duplicate files in pool with same CHECKSUM and same CONTENTS]:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 20:26:35 -0400 on Thursday, October 30,
2008:
It's really
18 matches
Mail list logo
