On 03/22 01:31 , Les Mikesell wrote:
> > How do you get a bandwidth availability metric? Short of trying to push
> > data back and forth, you can't.
>
> Most people would enter a fixed number for what they want backuppc to
> consume. Even if you can test it, you don't know if it will stay the
>
On 3/22/2011 12:24 PM, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:09 -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>> I think it would still be helpful to have a hook that would allow some
>> type of query of bandwidth available. Perhaps most users would never
>> use the hook but having the option to ca
Tyler J. Wagner wrote at about 17:24:29 + on Tuesday, March 22, 2011:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:09 -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > I think it would still be helpful to have a hook that would allow some
> > type of query of bandwidth available. Perhaps most users would never
> > use t
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:09 -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> I think it would still be helpful to have a hook that would allow some
> type of query of bandwidth available. Perhaps most users would never
> use the hook but having the option to call an external routine and
> return a bandwidth ava
Tyler J. Wagner wrote at about 16:26:28 + on Tuesday, March 22, 2011:
> On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:47 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > Agreed - I've always thought it would be nice if backuppc were aware of
> > hosts grouped on a network route as well and could separately limit the
> > concur
On 3/22/2011 11:02 AM, Tod Detre wrote:
>> Agreed - I've always thought it would be nice if backuppc were aware of
>> hosts grouped on a network route as well and could separately limit the
>> concurrency within the those groups. Maybe it could be generalized
>> with a concept of how much impact
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 10:47 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Agreed - I've always thought it would be nice if backuppc were aware of
> hosts grouped on a network route as well and could separately limit the
> concurrency within the those groups. Maybe it could be generalized
> with a concept of ho
> Agreed - I've always thought it would be nice if backuppc were aware of
> hosts grouped on a network route as well and could separately limit the
> concurrency within the those groups. Maybe it could be generalized
> with a concept of how much impact a run will have on total concurrency
> (to l
On 3/22/2011 9:26 AM, Jeff Schmidt wrote:
>
> not to jack this thread, but the concept of 'groups' would be extremely
> beneficial in virtualized environments (let's not backup /all/ of the
> vm's on a single physical host at the same time). I've seen some talk of
> using a semaphore
> (http://www.
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 07:31 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 3/22/11 7:10 AM, Scott wrote:
> > If there is a different place to submit features, I apologize.
> >
> > It would be great if there were a field for machine description - for
> > example
> > for location or similar.
> >
> > Most of the ma
I think the smartest thing is to allow host templates which are effectively
hosts, except they cannot be archived or restored. Then when you create a
host, you can specify a template. Any customisations in that template are
inherited, but overrides in the host take precedence.
Regards,
Tyler
O
(Damn, I thought I had posted it to the list, but I can't find it)
I was thinking about setting up something like this by editing the config.cf.
I was more concerned with dividing by distribution, but I guess you could do
it by function. What I was thinking of doing is setting a variable that
cont
Tóth Andor wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
> membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by
> creating symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some
> built in solutions for this?
>
The cl
Tóth Andor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I?d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
> membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by
> creating symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some
> built in solutions for this?
>
> Regards,
> And
Hello,
I’d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by creating
symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some built in
solutions for this?
Regards,
Andor
-
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 10:59 +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I make backup of about 50 hosts, and the list still grows.
>
> Right now, they're all displayed on one page, which makes things a bit messy.
>
> Is it possible to make "host grouping", where groups of hosts could be
> logically group
I make backup of about 50 hosts, and the list still grows.
Right now, they're all displayed on one page, which makes things a bit messy.
Is it possible to make "host grouping", where groups of hosts could be
logically grouped (i.e., group_A for host_1, host_2, and group_B for host_3
and host_4)?
17 matches
Mail list logo
