Holger Parplies wrote:
>
> So, do you insist on making the original poster believe that running several
> instances of BackupPC on the same pool is a good idea, or can we maybe find
> some other topic to disagree on?
I'll insist that it should be possible, with the only real conflicts
being wha
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2009-07-08 10:32:50 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple
backuppc server]:
> [...]
Les, you are missing the important part, so I'll begin with it and repeat it a
few times throughout the mail:
> > Tino Schwarze wrote on 2009-07-08 10:11:43 +020
Holger Parplies wrote:
>>> We've started to setup a large multiple server backuppc environment [...]
>>> We've got a large 2TB nas at the back of it with gig connectivity.
>>> Filesystem is LVM on top of OCFS2 so we have multiple front-end servers
>>> with read/write. [...] The actual top/backup l
Hi,
Tino Schwarze wrote on 2009-07-08 10:11:43 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Multiple
backuppc server]:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:50:56PM +0100, Andy Brown wrote:
> > We've started to setup a large multiple server backuppc environment [...]
> > We've got a large 2TB n
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 01:50:56PM +0100, Andy Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
> We've started to setup a large multiple server backuppc environment, and
> wanted a few thoughts/ideas/advice.
> We've got a large 2TB nas at the back of it with gig connectivity.
> Filesystem is LVM on top of OCFS2 so we have
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 08:50, Andy Brown wrote:
> Anyone see any pitfalls/problems with what I'm doing here?
Yes, IMHO you are introducing complexity where it is not needed.
What are you trying to accomplish?
Fault-tolerance? In that case you should probably have an
active/passive deploymen
Hi All,
We've started to setup a large multiple server backuppc environment, and wanted
a few thoughts/ideas/advice.
We've got a large 2TB nas at the back of it with gig connectivity.
Filesystem is LVM on top of OCFS2 so we have multiple front-end servers with
read/write.
Backuppc on each host is
