-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Inno wrote:
> It's interesting to me because a lot of files are used during
> business hours. Suddenly I was wondering the repercussions it could
> have in your Backup ?
In my experience, it doesn't cause any issues.
There are a couple of factors to
It's interesting to me because a lot of files are used during business hours.
Suddenly I was wondering the repercussions it could have in your Backup ?
> De : "Inno"
> Have you no problem with files used during the business hours ?
>
> > De : "Adam Goryachev"
> > Also, I frequently add bwlimit
On 5/6/2010 8:19 AM, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
>
>> On slow connections it will help to add the -C (compress)
>> option to the ssh command. Be sure you exclude any areas or
>> big files you don't need to back up (like the slocate db on
>> linux boxes, etc.). If you do several remote backups, don't
> > What can you people suggest? Les, do you have some specific advices?
>
> On slow connections it will help to add the -C (compress)
> option to the ssh command. Be sure you exclude any areas or
> big files you don't need to back up (like the slocate db on
> linux boxes, etc.). If you do s
Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> Hello people.
>
>> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd
>> recommend setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to
>> minimize your bandwidth usage.
>
> I'm popping into this thread because I'm also running "outsourced
> backups" (me calling the
Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> Hy Inno,
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Maybe increase Full period if you use rsync ?
>
> what would that be causing, in positive terms?
I wouldn't do that - rsync fulls take longer in wall clock time because they
read all the files, but they don't take a lot more bandwidth and don
Hy Tyler,
> Rob's right. Running with IncrLevels = 1 means that every
> incremental will download every file with a modification time
> newer than the last Full. Using 6 incrementals with levels
> 1, 2, ... etc, will just mean that files must differ from the
> last good incremental to be dow
Have you no problem with files used during the business hours ?
> De : "Adam Goryachev"
> Also, I frequently add bwlimit to rsync so it doesn't 'flood' the remote
> link during backups. This can allow me to do some backups during periods
> which would otherwise not be possible (ie, business hours
On Thursday 06 May 2010 08:36:35 Adam Goryachev wrote:
> Also, I frequently add bwlimit to rsync so it doesn't 'flood' the remote
> link during backups. This can allow me to do some backups during periods
> which would otherwise not be possible (ie, business hours).
Me too. For any wireless lapto
On Wednesday 05 May 2010 23:02:14 Rob Owens wrote:
> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd recommend
> setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to minimize your
> bandwidth usage.
Rob's right. Running with IncrLevels = 1 means that every incremental will
download every f
Hello there.
> Enable checksum-caching, modify IncrLevels so that you don't
> re-transfer more and more data during each incremental.
Could you please explain more in depth what both suggestions could
benefit?
> Also, I frequently add bwlimit to rsync so it doesn't 'flood'
> the remote link du
Hy Inno,
> Hello,
>
> Maybe increase Full period if you use rsync ?
what would that be causing, in positive terms?
F.
--
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.
> And as Rob say :
> > For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd recommend
> > setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to minimize your
> > bandwidth usage.
OK, and what would the above change result in? What would the benefit
be?
Thanks,
F.
-
ort"
>>
>> Copie à :
>> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
>>
>>
>> Hello people.
>>
>>> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd
>>> recommend setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to
&
And as Rob say :
> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd
> recommend setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to
> minimize your bandwidth usage.
> De : "Boniforti Flavio"
> I can tell you that I'd like to lower some data transfer durations for
> at least two of my remote
Hello,
Maybe increase Full period if you use rsync ?
> Message du 06/05/10 à 08h38
> De : "Boniforti Flavio"
> A : "General list for user discussion,questions and support"
>
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
>
>
&
Hello people.
> For the machines being backed up over the internet, I'd
> recommend setting IncrLevels to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 in order to
> minimize your bandwidth usage.
I'm popping into this thread because I'm also running "outsourced
backups" (me calling them "remote backups").
I'm successfully
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:08:51AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/4/2010 9:38 AM, Inno wrote:
> > It's a very good idea. But with this solution I am forced to do a single
> > full then incrementals. And I'm not sure the speed of upload will be
> > sufficient.
>
> Rsync full backups still only
net
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
>
>
> On 5/4/2010 10:42 AM, Erik Hjertén wrote:
> > Les Mikesell skrev 2010-05-04 14:50:
> >> Inno wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500
I will look at how much data changes each day. I'm perplexed though your
solution seems the best.
> Message du 04/05/10 à 17h26
> De : "Kameleon"
> A : "General list for user discussion questions and support"
>
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [Back
On 5/4/2010 10:42 AM, Erik Hjertén wrote:
> Les Mikesell skrev 2010-05-04 14:50:
>> Inno wrote:
>>
>>> I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 GB.
>>>
>>>
>> With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which
>> you might take on-site and carry
On 5/4/2010 9:38 AM, Inno wrote:
> It's a very good idea. But with this solution I am forced to do a single full
> then incrementals. And I'm not sure the speed of upload will be sufficient.
Rsync full backups still only transfer the differences from the last
full. They run slower than incremen
Les Mikesell skrev 2010-05-04 14:50:
Inno wrote:
I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 GB.
With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which
you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). The
bandwidth/ti
t; Message du 04/05/10 à 16h15
> > De : "Kameleon"
> > A : in...@voila.fr, "General list for user discussion, questions and
> support"
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
> >
> > What I would do is this:
> &
On 5/4/2010 8:55 AM, Inno wrote:
> I will test it (but I want a full backup every week). We have a connection
> with 250 KB/s.
>
> My goal is not to centralize backups so I wondered if my solution will be
> good.
>
> Imagine if the company burns or HDD breaks. For me it's better to have two
> HD
ist for user discussion, questions and support"
>
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
>
> What I would do is this:
>
> Setup backuppc for company A at the company B location
> Setup backuppc for company B at the company A location
>
>
Message du 04/05/10 à 15h23
> > De : "Kameleon"
> > A : "General list for user discussion,questions and support" <
> backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
> >
> > This is v
ort"
>
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users] Outsourcing backup
>
> This is very true. We have 4 remote sites, 2 T1's (1.5megabit up and down)
> and 2 DSL (1.5megabit down x 256 kilobit up) and have a central backuppc
> server located in-house that backs up those 4 s
This is very true. We have 4 remote sites, 2 T1's (1.5megabit up and down)
and 2 DSL (1.5megabit down x 256 kilobit up) and have a central backuppc
server located in-house that backs up those 4 server and 10 more in house on
the local fiber network. The only issue was the initial full on the 2 DSL
Inno wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can you see a problem in this thinking :
>
> We have two business building not connected between them.
> Servers are not the same.
> I would like outsourcing data.
> Backups are done on two Ethernet HDD.
>
> So I imagined this:
> Company A - Full backup on Friday night.
Inno wrote:
> I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 GB.
>
With rsync the size doesn't matter much after you get the initial copy (which
you might take on-site and carry over or let it run over a weekend). The
bandwidth/time you need nightly would depend on the rate
I have not a decent internet connectivity and I have more than 500 GB.
> Message du 04/05/10 à 14h19
> De : "Les Mikesell"
> A : in...@voila.fr, "General list for user discussion, questions and support"
>
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [BackupPC-users]
Hello,
Can you see a problem in this thinking :
We have two business building not connected between them.
Servers are not the same.
I would like outsourcing data.
Backups are done on two Ethernet HDD.
So I imagined this:
Company A - Full backup on Friday night. Incremental backup every day.
Comp
33 matches
Mail list logo
