It's on the Wiki - a good place to look and answer many basic
questions by the way
Bryan Keadle (.net) wrote at about 14:25:14 -0500 on Friday, July 13, 2012:
> Care to share your "shadowmountrsync"?
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
>
> > Michael Stowe wrote at about 10:13:3
Care to share your "shadowmountrsync"?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 1:48 PM, wrote:
> Michael Stowe wrote at about 10:13:35 -0500 on Wednesday, July 11, 2012:
> > Naturally, I do lose ACLs and whatnot, but aside from a few tweaks, the
> > process at least works. I've been considering adding a sup
Kris Lou wrote at about 09:40:12 -0700 on Wednesday, July 11, 2012:
> > >> Naturally, I do lose ACLs and whatnot, but aside from a few tweaks,
> > >> the process at least works. I've been considering adding a
> > >> supplemental ACL backup to the routine.
> > >
> > > That sounds like a useful
Michael Stowe wrote at about 10:13:35 -0500 on Wednesday, July 11, 2012:
> Naturally, I do lose ACLs and whatnot, but aside from a few tweaks, the
> process at least works. I've been considering adding a supplemental ACL
> backup to the routine.
In my vshadow script -- shadowmountrsync -- for
> >> Naturally, I do lose ACLs and whatnot, but aside from a few tweaks,
> >> the process at least works. I've been considering adding a
> >> supplemental ACL backup to the routine.
> >
> > That sounds like a useful idea, but really, what are the ACL's used
> > for? Is that just additional end-use
> On 12/07/12 01:13, Michael Stowe wrote:
>> The short answer is that for a bare metal restore, I first install
>> a stock OS, then use BackupPC_tarCreate, restore everything to a
>> directory, then use the recovery console to rotate it into place.
>> After a reboot, everything's back, including th
On 12/07/12 01:13, Michael Stowe wrote:
> The short answer is that for a bare metal restore, I first install
> a stock OS, then use BackupPC_tarCreate, restore everything to a
> directory, then use the recovery console to rotate it into place.
> After a reboot, everything's back, including the regi
> On 11/07/12 00:12, Michael Stowe wrote:
>>> The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in
>>> Windows
>>> XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows
>>> 7.
>> Huh. XP doesn't have any junction points by default (although it
>> supports
>> them) so I
On 11/07/12 00:12, Michael Stowe wrote:
>> The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in Windows
>> XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows 7.
> Huh. XP doesn't have any junction points by default (although it supports
> them) so I guess you mean yo
> "Michael Stowe" wrote on 07/10/2012 11:14:34
> AM:
>
>> > How are you backing the junction points up. AFAIK backuppc treats
>> > those as actual directories and not junction points (i.e. the concept
>> > of a junction point doesn't exist in backuppc's universe like a
>> > symbolic link does.) Po
"Michael Stowe" wrote on 07/10/2012 11:14:34
AM:
> > How are you backing the junction points up. AFAIK backuppc treats
> > those as actual directories and not junction points (i.e. the concept
> > of a junction point doesn't exist in backuppc's universe like a
> > symbolic link does.) Pooling wi
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:12:54AM -0500, Michael Stowe wrote:
>>
>> > The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in
>> Windows
>> > XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows
>> 7.
>>
>> Huh. XP doesn't have any junction points by default (although
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 09:12:54AM -0500, Michael Stowe wrote:
>
> > The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in Windows
> > XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows 7.
>
> Huh. XP doesn't have any junction points by default (although it support
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:28:34PM -0500, Bryan Keadle (.net) wrote:
> What is the actual process/command that happens when I click on the
> Override button of a hosts config file - specifically the SmbShareName?
>
> I have a "Self Provisioning" solution whereby a user can authenticate to a
> Back
> The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in Windows
> XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows 7.
Huh. XP doesn't have any junction points by default (although it supports
them) so I guess you mean you're excluding 7 junctions like "Documents
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Bryan Keadle (.net) wrote:
> The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in Windows
> XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows 7.
Not sure what you meant by provisioning, but maybe you can use an
existing config as a
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Bryan Keadle (.net) wrote:
> What is the actual process/command that happens when I click on the Override
> button of a hosts config file - specifically the SmbShareName?
Basically it means that the value set will be saved in the per-pc
config instead of being inhe
The Windows 7 Junctions (which fail) are important directories in Windows
XP, and I've made an effort to exclude all the junctions from Windows 7.
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Michael Stowe
wrote:
> > What is the actual process/command that happens when I click on the
> > Override button of a
> What is the actual process/command that happens when I click on the
> Override button of a hosts config file - specifically the SmbShareName?
I'm going to go with "nothing."
The override check box indicates that it's a setting in the PC-specific
configuration rather than inherited from the main
What is the actual process/command that happens when I click on the
Override button of a hosts config file - specifically the SmbShareName?
I have a "Self Provisioning" solution whereby a user can authenticate to a
BackupPC web page, and their computer will automatically provision itself
for backu
20 matches
Mail list logo
