to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im
> Auftrag von Stephen Joyce
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2008 01:19
> An: Jonathan Dill
> Cc: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow
>
> On Tue, 27 May 2008, Jonathan Dill wrote:
>
On Tue, 27 May 2008, Jonathan Dill wrote:
> I can think of other cases where "push" might work better than "pull"
> either for security or network topology. I suppose if you have a fast
> enough WAN connection, you could even use something like FileZilla and
> SFTP (ftp over ssh) to "push" a back
On May 27, 2008, at 4:55 PM, Kurt Jasper wrote:
> Jonathan Dill wrote:
>
>> SyncBackSE can make use of Shadow Copy and can usually backup files
>> that would be skipped by rsync, it is also very efficient, especially
>> when using FastBackup mode.
>
> Thanks for mentioning FastBackup.
>
> I won't
Jonathan Dill wrote:
> SyncBackSE can make use of Shadow Copy and can usually backup files
> that would be skipped by rsync, it is also very efficient, especially
> when using FastBackup mode.
Thanks for mentioning FastBackup.
I won't use FastBackup because:
1) it's not opensource
2) I can
dan wrote:
> Rsync v3 does greatly(samba's words) improve memory usage and file
> list transfer time, as well as allowing transfers to begin before
> the full file list is tranfered. hardlink transfers are also much
> faster in v3.
>
> Other nice features are support for extended attributes
Hi,
> 3) The best choice was/is/seems to be to use rsyncd.
> I got excellent network speed and all files were succesfully
> backed up.
> Compared to Samba you can use Includes and Excludes lists. So
> you get all the benefits from rsync, but save the extra work
> to setup SSH and root-access f
> The biggest problem with the archive bit, however, is that
> the process assumes that only one application will clear the
> archive bit, when there could actually be several of them."
You mean when more than one application is used for Backups?
Greetings,
Hendrik
---
archive bit = evil. the archive bit is actually satan's unkle on his
mother's side.
anyway,
I don't know if there is a solution to the combination of I/O bottlenecks
and file checksumming with rsync taking a log time.
Rsync v3 does greatly(samba's words) improve memory usage and file list
trans
Hendrik Friedel wrote:
>>It would be nice to be able to use WindowsXP+'s index as a reference or
>> have the rsyncd on the windows machine maintain all the checksum
>> information but I know of no way and no plans to do this.
>
> Another option would be the archive bit, wouldn't it?
Read: The
Hendrik Friedel wrote:
> I have the same Problem. The backuppc performance is really poor with
> rsync. Have you tried samba for the transfer?
Success Story: After some testing I finally succeeded setting up our
linux server and some win xp/2k clients to work with BackupPC.
After spending l
ings,
Hendrik
_
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von dan
Gesendet: Samstag, 24. Mai 2008 05:04
An: Kurt Jasper
Cc: BackupPC User List
Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] Rsync to Windows client very slow (Was: Re:How
to BackupFilesExclude to exclude locked files on Windows XP)
Samba will copy the every file in it's entirety eating up bandwidth! and it
doesn't work remotely very well. It also is delivered via an abstraction
layer to the filesystem so you can't pull over permissions, every file ends
up having the permissions assigned to the samba share, and ownership
chan
Dear Kurt, dear all,
I have the same Problem. The backuppc performance is really poor with rsync.
Have you tried samba for the transfer?
> PS: To give at least something back to this community, I
> thought about writing down my experiences (from a beginners
> point of view), I hope this is the
rsync backups are quite slow. over slow links this is more than made up for
by the decrease in network bandwidth used but on a high speed lan it is very
slow. I am on gigabit from my desktop to my backuppc server but rarely
exceed 6-8MB/s during a backup.
That makes sense some of the time as rsy
Ok,
thanks for (all) the information, now I understand the concept of
Rsync/SambaShareName, BackupFilesExlude and BackupFilesOnly.
You really helped me out, Thanks :-)
But unfortunately I've discovered another problem:
The backups of my windows xp clients take forever (nearly), while the
backup
15 matches
Mail list logo
