Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-08 Thread Matthias Meyer
clint woodrow wrote: Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: clint woodrow wrote: Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-04 Thread clint woodrow
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote: Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: clint woodrow wrote: Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread clint woodrow
Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new mail. And you need a client on windows side. You can use cwRsync or rsync within a cygwin

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 clint woodrow wrote: Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new mail. And you need a

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD]: Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit this one new

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Holger Parplies wrote: Hi, clint woodrow wrote on 2009-06-02 19:50:08 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD]: Can I also take from this that BackupPC won't be storing full copies for every backup? No, as Adam has explained. If it's any

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-06-02 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009: clint woodrow wrote: Matthias Meyer wrote: rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst and receive one new mail at sunday. rsync will only transmit

[BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-05-15 Thread Robert J. Phillips
When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the process to use vshadow and rsyncd. I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use vshadow and SMB. What are the

Re: [BackupPC-users] SMB vs RSYNCD

2009-05-15 Thread Matthias Meyer
Robert J. Phillips wrote: When I first started using BackupPC I was letting the backups happen with SMB. I have since found and figured out how to make it work the process to use vshadow and rsyncd. I think now that I understand the vshadow command that I could use vshadow and SMB.

[BackupPC-users] SMB Vs Rsyncd restores and filling data

2008-11-23 Thread Eric Snyder
I have looked for info on this but need a confirmation on some questions I have. I was using SMB for backing up a few XP machines and switched to Rsyncd on one of them. In looking at the backups there are some differences. First SMB. When I look at a SMB backup (full or incremental) I see what