Re: [BackupPC-users] Slow link options

2009-12-20 Thread stoffell
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > One way would be to initially set up the new server backup with a > clientalias > setting pointing to the local copy. Then after you have a full, remove the > clientalias or change it to the real target. > > But, mv'ing the directories shoul

Re: [BackupPC-users] Slow link options

2009-12-19 Thread Les Mikesell
Kameleon wrote: > I was able to get a full backup on 3 of the 4 servers. Two of them I was > able to take the backuppc machine to the location and the third it was > small enough to be able to complete over the T1. However we have one > remaining remote location that has approximately 309GB of d

Re: [BackupPC-users] Slow link options

2009-12-18 Thread Kameleon
I was able to get a full backup on 3 of the 4 servers. Two of them I was able to take the backuppc machine to the location and the third it was small enough to be able to complete over the T1. However we have one remaining remote location that has approximately 309GB of data that needs backing up.

Re: [BackupPC-users] Slow link options

2009-12-16 Thread Chris Robertson
Kameleon wrote: > I have a few remote sites I am wanting to backup using backuppc. > However, two are on slow DSL connections and the other 2 are on T1's. > I did some math and roughly figured that the DSL connections, having a > 256k upload, could do approximately 108MB/hour of transfer. With t

[BackupPC-users] Slow link options

2009-12-16 Thread Kameleon
I have a few remote sites I am wanting to backup using backuppc. However, two are on slow DSL connections and the other 2 are on T1's. I did some math and roughly figured that the DSL connections, having a 256k upload, could do approximately 108MB/hour of transfer. With these clients having around