On 6/30/2011 4:41 PM, C. Ronoz wrote:
>
> Back-up is still running...
> root@artemis:~# ps aux | grep rsyn
> root 1674 8.8 1.4 19384 7240 ?Ss 19:00 24:23
> /usr/bin/rsync --server --sender --numeric-ids --perms --owner --group -D
> --links --hard-links --times --block-size=204
>
> Details please! Is the client Windows or Linux? What backup method are
> you using (rsync, smb, etc)? How are the client and server connected
> (LAN, vpn, ssh tunnel)?
>
> This is not normal. My 300GB backup only takes 15 hours. Something is
> slowing down the transfer.
>
> --
> Bowie
>
Li
On 6/30/2011 2:04 PM, C. Ronoz wrote:
> I ran bacula and it backed up this ENTIRE client in like 7 minutes. After 40
> minutes, backuppc has only backed up a measly 300MB... of a total of 1.5GB. I
> am not even sure how much aready was in-use on the partition after creating
> the new partition.
On 6/30/2011 3:04 PM, C. Ronoz wrote:
> I ran bacula and it backed up this ENTIRE client in like 7 minutes. After 40
> minutes, backuppc has only backed up a measly 300MB... of a total of 1.5GB. I
> am not even sure how much aready was in-use on the partition after creating
> the new partition.
I ran bacula and it backed up this ENTIRE client in like 7 minutes. After 40
minutes, backuppc has only backed up a measly 300MB... of a total of 1.5GB. I
am not even sure how much aready was in-use on the partition after creating the
new partition.
root@backuppc:~# df -h
Filesystem
What about using 2 BackupPC servers. Split all the backups over two
physical servers. 1 server does 100 PC's the other server does the other
100.
James Ward wrote:
> In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
> upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the s
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 12:19, James Ward wrote:
> In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
> upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the system is 99%
> wait. What is the best mix, half wait and half CPU bound?
Disk head motion is bound to be the bottlene
In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the system is 99%
wait. What is the best mix, half wait and half CPU bound?
I'm concerned about performance because I am backing up over 200
machines and so far, I'm only
