A quick google for backuppc graph patch gives me
http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg09322.html
which tells me that the patch was by Ludovic Drolez back in the Spring
of 2008, against BackupPC 3.1.0. He also seems to have been the one to
do a debian package with the
Ed McDonagh wrote:
The 3.2.0beta1 version didn't have the graph patch.
Could this be anything to do with your issue?
For my own benefit, can anyone tell me if B. Alexander's debian build of
3.2 has the graphing patch? I haven't tested it yet. And on that note,
does anyone have any success or
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 8:20 PM, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On Monday 06 Sep 2010 08:19:14 Michael wrote:
> > 2010/9/6 Tyler J. Wagner
> > >
> > > Did you change the CPU architecture on that one host? If so, did you
> keep
> > > a copy of pool.rrd before BackupPC ran the next nightly job?
> >
> > N
Do the graphs appear but not work, or are they not there at all?
When I upgraded from 3.1 from the ubuntu repositories to 3.2.0beta1 from
the website, I lost my graphs.
I did a little research and found that at some point someone had done a
patch to display the graphs, and that was included in t
On Monday 06 Sep 2010 08:19:14 Michael wrote:
> 2010/9/6 Tyler J. Wagner
> >
> > Did you change the CPU architecture on that one host? If so, did you keep
> > a copy of pool.rrd before BackupPC ran the next nightly job?
>
> NO it was a clean install on amd64 ( on i386 )
In that case, I don't know
Michael,
Did you change the CPU architecture on that one host? If so, did you keep a
copy of pool.rrd before BackupPC ran the next nightly job?
I haven't tested this theory, but I fear that if you let rrdtool on amd64
update an rrd file from i386, the resulting file had bad data. I don't know i
I'm using 3.1.0 on debain lenny on a few hosta. On one of them I can't see
any graphs.
(pool.rrd is there with proper permissions, done dump and restore for it,
still no luck. )
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Sep 2010 12:18:09 Albert Ulmer wrote:
> > I have
On Sunday 05 Sep 2010 12:18:09 Albert Ulmer wrote:
> I have the same problem with the graphs on the main page not being shown
> after having upgraded from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0. The upgrade was done by
> upgrading a Ubuntu Server 8.04LTS to 10.04LTS. I have reinstalled from
> scratch only porting the conf
Hello Koen,
I have the same problem with the graphs on the main page not being shown
after having upgraded from 3.0.0 to 3.1.0. The upgrade was done by upgrading
a Ubuntu Server 8.04LTS to 10.04LTS. I have reinstalled from scratch only
porting the config files and the problem indeed persists.
Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Koen Linders wrote:
>> 1) Shouldn't the uncompressed pool be empty? I guess it's safe to
>> actually delete all data in the pool dir? But why does Nightly
>> cleanup removes things on Etch server at night?
>>
>> 2) And since the upgrade to 3.1. the 2 g
> 1) Shouldn't the uncompressed pool be empty?
> I guess it's safe to actually delete all data in the pool dir? But why
> does
> Nightly cleanup removes things on Etch server at night?
>
> 2) And since the upgrade to 3.1. the 2 graphs for pools aren't showing
> (https://192.168.1.5/backuppc/index.
2 Backuppc 3.1.0 servers (1 Debian Etch, 1 Debian Lenny)
Lenny was rsynced from etch and backups now the same hosts from another
building. Both have same configs, except ServerHost and some other server
specific things. Compression has been on for atleast a year on Debian Etch
server. Maybe since
12 matches
Mail list logo