On 11/8/06, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I pull the latest code from CVS, is there anything special I need
> to do before using it to upgrade compared to the normal tarball?
Hey look, there appears to be a handy makeDist script. Let's see how
that works. :-)
-Dave
-
On 11/8/06, Craig Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Well, are there any known issues with the current beta? I would like
> > to start testing 3.0, but IIRC there was some issues with the first
> > beta so I was waiting for the 2nd one...
>
> There are no known significant issues with the curre
David writes:
> I personally would like to see more frequent beta releases that
> quickly address any known issues.
Me too :).
> Well, are there any known issues with the current beta? I would like
> to start testing 3.0, but IIRC there was some issues with the first
> beta so I was waiting for
David writes:
> > On 11/7/06, Craig Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I will do one more 3.0.0 beta by the end of this month.
> > > That should be very close to the final 3.0.0 release.
> > >
> > > Even though the 3.0.0 beta releases are quite stable, given the
> > > wide deployment of Back
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:57:09 -0800
David Rees wrote:
> On 11/7/06, Craig Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I will do one more 3.0.0 beta by the end of this month.
> > That should be very close to the final 3.0.0 release.
> >
> > Even though the 3.0.0 beta releases are quite stable, given the
>
On 11/7/06, Craig Barratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will do one more 3.0.0 beta by the end of this month.
> That should be very close to the final 3.0.0 release.
>
> Even though the 3.0.0 beta releases are quite stable, given the
> wide deployment of BackupPC I wanted to have a conservative be
Riaan writes:
> Was wondering the same thing myself, also when will version 3 go out of
> beta/when will a final version of 3 go out ?
I will do one more 3.0.0 beta by the end of this month.
That should be very close to the final 3.0.0 release.
Even though the 3.0.0 beta releases are quite stabl
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Les Stott wrote:
> My experience
>
> version 3.0.0beta1 to me seems as solid as you get. my setup really doesn't
> change so i am happy with it.
>
> The big thing with version 3 is the ability to edit configuration and hosts
> files per pc and globally via the cgi interfa
"Mikael Lammentausta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Hi Mikael
> I was wondering if someone knows a repository for Ubuntu which has
> the required upgrade to File::Rsync perl module. The latest in
> Dapper/Edgy is 0.52 while the required is 0.64.
>
I had a similar problem with Debian a few months a
Title: VS: [BackupPC-users] Upgrade to 3.0.0 beta
I was wondering if someone knows a repository for Ubuntu which has the required upgrade to File::Rsync perl module. The latest in Dapper/Edgy is 0.52 while the required is 0.64
Hey guys,
My experience
version 3.0.0beta1 to me seems as solid as you get. my setup really
doesn't change so i am happy with it.
The big thing with version 3 is the ability to edit configuration and
hosts files per pc and globally via the cgi interface. This is HUGE as
it means full adm
Was wondering the same thing myself, also when will version 3 go out of
beta/when will a final version of 3 go out ?
Regards
Riaan
On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 11:00 +0100, Klaas Vantournhout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the current moment we are running BackupPC 2.1.2 and we are very
> pleased with it.
>
> Po
Hi,
At the current moment we are running BackupPC 2.1.2 and we are very
pleased with it.
Pool is 161.69GB comprising 633721 files and 4369 directories
144 full backups of total size 3499.96GB (prior to pooling and compression),
262 incr backups of total size 200.43GB (prior to pooling and compres
13 matches
Mail list logo
