> -Original Message-
> From: Koen Vermeer [mailto:k...@vermeer.tv]
> Sent: den 17 oktober 2014 21:49
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> > [root@cyndane ~]# yes | pv | ssh titan "c
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 17 oktober 2014 16:57
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> > I was worried the full
On 10/17/2014 09:40 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> What about testing the speed over the ssh tunnel? That may tell you
>> whether ssh is slowing down your transfers or that it's due to rsync. If it
>> is
>> ssh, you could trade encryption strength for speed.
> Would the below do?
>
> [root@cyndane ~]# y
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> I was worried the full backup wouldn't complete in the limited time the BPC
> server in online.
> For practical reasons (well, because of the hd-space available really), the
> server used is off during nights in order to save some electricit
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 17 oktober 2014 14:55
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> > Not too many new fil
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>
>> That sounds pretty good. But unless you have a lot of new files
>> created daily, the bottleneck is usually disk speed, especially
>> merging a lot of small changes into a big existing file.
>
> Not too many new files daily, the reading is
Hi,
Sorin Srbu wrote on 2014-10-16 12:25:53 + [[BackupPC-users] Using NFS to
increase backup speed]:
> I'm seeing network speeds at about 35-45 Mbps when using BackupPC and rsync
> over ssh.
it is a frequent misconception that you *want* to see anything close to the
speed the
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2014 18:09
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> > I'm seeing netwo
> -Original Message-
> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2014 18:09
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> > I'm seeing netwo
> -Original Message-
> From: Colin Shorts [mailto:c.sho...@intrallect.com]
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2014 17:58
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> You may wish to prevent ssh from using com
> -Original Message-
> From: Koen Vermeer [mailto:k...@vermeer.tv]
> Sent: den 16 oktober 2014 17:29
> To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Using NFS to increase backup speed
>
> What about testing the speed over
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:25 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> I'm seeing network speeds at about 35-45 Mbps when using BackupPC and rsync
> over ssh.
>
That sounds pretty good. But unless you have a lot of new files
created daily, the bottleneck is usually disk speed, especially
merging a lot of small
You may wish to prevent ssh from using compression when using a fast
link, the overhead probably isn't worth it and may give you a reasonable
boost in throughput.
Like Koen said, you'll want to benchmark the different scenarios.
Regards,
Colin
On 16/10/14 16:28, Koen Vermeer wrote:
What abo
What about testing the speed over the ssh tunnel? That may tell you whether ssh
is slowing down your transfers or that it's due to rsync. If it is ssh, you
could trade encryption strength for speed.
Best,
Koen
On October 16, 2014 2:25:53 PM CEST, Sorin Srbu
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm seeing
Hi all,
I'm seeing network speeds at about 35-45 Mbps when using BackupPC and rsync
over ssh.
Running iperf below I notice the network should theoretically be capable of a
bit more than that. I understand that ssh adds quite a bit of bottleneck.
[root@titan ~]# iperf -c cyndane
---
15 matches
Mail list logo
