, 2013 1:34 PM
To: Mark Campbell; backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
Thanks Mark.
From the zfs man page for zol it looks like the default compression is lzjb,
same as other zfs implementations. I generally use lz4 which is basically lzjb
From: Timothy J Massey [mailto:tmas...@obscorp.com]
Sent: den 16 december 2013 18:23
To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote on 12/16/2013 09:40:56 AM:
Anyway
, questions and support
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Timothy J Massey wrote:
One last thing: everyone who uses ZFS raves about it. But seeing as
(on
Linux) you're limited to either FUSE or out-of-tree kernel modules (of
questionable legality
...@rather.puzzling.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 10:00 PM
To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Timothy J Massey wrote:
One last thing: everyone who uses ZFS raves about it. But seeing
Russell R Poyner rpoy...@engr.wisc.edu wrote on 12/17/2013 11:12:07 AM:
This is a poor comparison since we have different data sets, but it
would appear that BackupPC's internal dedupe and compression is
comparable to, or only slightly worse than what zfs achieves. This in
spite of the
even higher.
Thanks,
--Mark
-Original Message-
From: Russell R Poyner [mailto:rpoy...@engr.wisc.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2013 11:12 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mark Campbell
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
Mark,
Questions, and some
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mark Campbell
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
Mark,
Questions, and some comments.
Questions:
What have you done to tune your zfs?
Do you use a ZIL? and or an L2ARC?
How much ram do you have?
What compression level are you
On 18/12/13 03:35, Timothy J Massey wrote:
Russell R Poyner rpoy...@engr.wisc.edu wrote on 12/17/2013 11:12:07 AM:
This is a poor comparison since we have different data sets, but it
would appear that BackupPC's internal dedupe and compression is
comparable to, or only slightly worse than
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3+TB. The
issue I'm having is e2fsck is taking an extremely long time to finish. It is
stuck on the checking directory structure. We are going on 48 hours.
So I'm wondering what other file systems do you guys use? Any
On 13-12-16 10:06 AM, Mark Rosedale wrote:
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3+TB. The
issue I'm having is e2fsck is taking an extremely long time to finish. It is
stuck on the checking directory structure. We are going on 48 hours.
So I'm wondering what
-Original Message-
From: Mark Rosedale [mailto:mrosed...@vivox.com]
Sent: den 16 december 2013 15:06
To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
Subject: [BackupPC-users] What file system do you use?
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3+TB.
The issue I'm having is e2fsck is taking an extremely long time to finish.
It is stuck on the checking directory structure. We are going on 48 hours.
So I'm wondering what other file systems do you guys use? Any
Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote on 12/16/2013 09:40:56 AM:
Anyway, Anaconda objected at my choosing ext4 for the 40 TB raid-array
when I
recently set up a new system, and defaulted to xfs instead.
EXT4 won't support file systems 16TB at all with 4k blocks, and depending
on OS and
FWIW, it looks like RHEL 7 (plus clones) will now default to XFS.
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Michael Stowe
mst...@chicago.us.mensa.orgwrote:
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3+TB.
The issue I'm having is e2fsck is
Mark Rosedale mrosed...@vivox.com wrote on 12/16/2013 09:06:07 AM:
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3
+TB. The issue I'm having is e2fsck is taking an extremely long time
to finish. It is stuck on the checking directory structure. We are
going on 48 hours.
Timothy J Massey tmas...@obscorp.com wrote on 12/16/2013 02:35:44 PM:
Mark Rosedale mrosed...@vivox.com wrote on 12/16/2013 09:06:07 AM:
I'm working on bringing back a backuppc instance. It is very large 3
+TB. The issue I'm having is e2fsck is taking an extremely long time
to finish. It
On Mon, 16 Dec 2013, Timothy J Massey wrote:
One last thing: everyone who uses ZFS raves about it. But seeing as (on
Linux) you're limited to either FUSE or out-of-tree kernel modules (of
questionable legality: ZFS' CDDL license is *not* GPL compatible), it's
not my first choice for a
17 matches
Mail list logo
