On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 17:58, Travis Fraser wrote:
> > > I am having problem with Cygwin's rsyncd (tunneled through ssh) and
> > > did not know of a Backuppc rsyncd.
> >
> > last I knew, rsync+ssh didn't work properly on Windoze machines. Someone
> > reported success recently, but I don't know wh
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 12:41 -0600, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 11/21 01:39 , Joe Hood wrote:
> > I am having problem with Cygwin's rsyncd (tunneled through ssh) and
> > did not know of a Backuppc rsyncd.
>
> last I knew, rsync+ssh didn't work properly on Windoze machines. Someone
> reporte
ubject: [BackupPC-users] cygwin-rsyncd vs. backuppc-rsyncd
Date sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:46:26 -0600
> I've finally run into a situation where the Windoze machine to be
> backed up, has a cygwin installation already.
>
> Should I use the backuppc-rsyncd package, or us
On 11/21 01:39 , Joe Hood wrote:
> I am having problem with Cygwin's rsyncd (tunneled through ssh) and
> did not know of a Backuppc rsyncd.
last I knew, rsync+ssh didn't work properly on Windoze machines. Someone
reported success recently, but I don't know what they did differently.
--
Carl Sod
I am having problem with Cygwin's rsyncd (tunneled through ssh) and
did not know of a Backuppc rsyncd.
(I'm getting an rsync protocol mismatch, I'm thinking it has something
to do with my Backuppc machine running on a AMD64 system).
On 11/21/05, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've finally run into a situation where the Windoze machine to be backed up,
has a cygwin installation already.
Should I use the backuppc-rsyncd package, or use the one included with
cygwin?
I believe in the past it was advised to use the backuppc-specific one; but I
can't remember because it did
