[cut]
> That's it, in the log file i see during restore :
Hi Alex,
> connect from UKNOWN x.X.X.X (ip adress)
> receiving file list
> Using VSS Volume : \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\shadowcopy1
> Error -2147212521 on line 85! (problem writing on vss i think)
> Error -2147024809 on line 100! (again)
>
Alex wrote:
>
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Alex wrote at about 10:04:12 -0400 on Tuesday, June 23, 2009:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > > back again, just still experimenting this solution, everything is ok
> > > while reading.
> > >
> > > But, i'm used to restore data on Windows PC using th
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Alex wrote at about 10:04:12 -0400 on Tuesday, June 23, 2009:
>
> >
> > Hello,
> > back again, just still experimenting this solution, everything is ok while
> > reading.
> >
> > But, i'm used to restore data on Windows PC using the chmod command
> > "--chmod=Dug
Alex wrote at about 10:04:12 -0400 on Tuesday, June 23, 2009:
>
> Hello,
> back again, just still experimenting this solution, everything is ok while
> reading.
>
> But, i'm used to restore data on Windows PC using the chmod command
> "--chmod=Dugo+rwx,Fugo+rwx" to allow user to read fil
Hello,
back again, just still experimenting this solution, everything is ok while
reading.
But, i'm used to restore data on Windows PC using the chmod command
"--chmod=Dugo+rwx,Fugo+rwx" to allow user to read files.
Because rsync runs as daemon under system account, writen files are not
reada
Alex wrote:
> Anyway, let me thank you a lot, as it work great with backuppc :D
>
> This helped me a lot, the two binaries are usable as is on each system :
> http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
>
> Tested it on XP / Vista w/o problem using backuppc. Been able to save my "in
> use" pst fi
Adam Goryachev wrote:
> Alex wrote:
>> Alex wrote:
>>> Alex wrote:
Anyway, let me thank you a lot, as it work great with backuppc :D
This helped me a lot, the two binaries are usable as is on each system :
http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
Tested it on XP / Vist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alex wrote:
>
> Alex wrote:
>> Alex wrote:
>>> Anyway, let me thank you a lot, as it work great with backuppc :D
>>>
>>> This helped me a lot, the two binaries are usable as is on each system :
>>> http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
>>>
>>> Test
Alex wrote:
>
> Alex wrote:
> > Anyway, let me thank you a lot, as it work great with backuppc :D
> >
> > This helped me a lot, the two binaries are usable as is on each system :
> > http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
> >
> > Tested it on XP / Vista w/o problem using backuppc. Been able
Anyway, let me thank you a lot, as it work great with backuppc :D
This helped me a lot, the two binaries are usable as is on each system :
http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
Tested it on XP / Vista w/o problem using backuppc. Been able to save my "in
use" pst files.
Great.
+
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Leen Besselink wrote:
So Les, what do you think ? If you look at my current webpage ?
>>> I don't know enough about GPLv3 to comment, but I'd expect it to
>>> prohibit including any portions that can't be distributed under GPL
>>> terms like v2 does. Dynamic linking to
Leen Besselink wrote:
>>> So Les, what do you think ? If you look at my current webpage ?
>> I don't know enough about GPLv3 to comment, but I'd expect it to
>> prohibit including any portions that can't be distributed under GPL
>> terms like v2 does. Dynamic linking to expected OS libs is proba
>> So Les, what do you think ? If you look at my current webpage ?
>
> I don't know enough about GPLv3 to comment, but I'd expect it to
> prohibit including any portions that can't be distributed under GPL
> terms like v2 does. Dynamic linking to expected OS libs is probably OK
> if you don't
Leen Besselink wrote:
>
>>> prohibits that sort of program improvement unless all of the work can
>>> have the GPL terms applied. There are some execptions for things that
>>> are part of the native OS but I'm not sure where an add-on sdk fits into
>>> the picture.
>>>
>> The SDk just facilita
Leen Besselink wrote:
>> Have you verified that the terms of the MS libraries are such that you
>> are allowed to redistribute a program covered by the GPL (like rsync)
>> with it included? I'm not a big fan of the GPL because it generally
>
> Thank you for pointing that out, I was actually al
> Have you verified that the terms of the MS libraries are such that you
> are allowed to redistribute a program covered by the GPL (like rsync)
> with it included? I'm not a big fan of the GPL because it generally
Thank you for pointing that out, I was actually already thinking about that.
I
Leen Besselink wrote:
>> Definitely sounds like a very helpful tool and if it works it should
>
> It's not really a tool, it's integrated in rsync itself. ;-)
>
>> avoid a lot of the kludges associated with other methods (such as the
>> recursive script I wrote to automatically launch VSS and rsy
> Definitely sounds like a very helpful tool and if it works it should
It's not really a tool, it's integrated in rsync itself. ;-)
> avoid a lot of the kludges associated with other methods (such as the
> recursive script I wrote to automatically launch VSS and rsyncd based
> on an arbitrary rsy
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Leen Besselink wrote at about 12:19:27 +0200 on Saturday, June 6, 2009:
> > > Hi, have to say that this is an ever wanted great tool, btw, i really
> thank you for that, as this might help a lot even out off the backuppc
> context !
> > >
> >
> > I'm not a back
Alex wrote at about 03:34:44 -0400 on Saturday, June 6, 2009:
>
> [quote="Leen Besselink"]Alex wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the post, this is about rsync 3.0.x with Windows VSS-support
> > available here :
> > http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
> >
> > (not used to post from this forum)
Leen Besselink wrote at about 12:19:27 +0200 on Saturday, June 6, 2009:
> > Hi, have to say that this is an ever wanted great tool, btw, i really
> > thank you for that, as this might help a lot even out off the backuppc
> > context !
> >
>
> I'm not a backuppc user myself. I was trying
> Hi, have to say that this is an ever wanted great tool, btw, i really thank
> you for that, as this might help a lot even out off the backuppc context !
>
I'm not a backuppc user myself. I was trying to help myself. :-)
> I'm interested in it. As you say it works normaly as an rsync server,
[quote="Leen Besselink"]Alex wrote:
> Sorry for the post, this is about rsync 3.0.x with Windows VSS-support
> available here :
> http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
>
> (not used to post from this forum)
>
>
> Alex wrote:
>
> > Hi, thank you for the post. This seem to be a great tool,
Alex wrote:
> Sorry for the post, this is about rsync 3.0.x with Windows VSS-support
> available here :
> http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
>
> (not used to post from this forum)
>
>
> Alex wrote:
>> Hi, thank you for the post. This seem to be a great tool, hope we'll get it
>> working
Sorry for the post, this is about rsync 3.0.x with Windows VSS-support
available here :
http://www.consolejunky.net/cwrsync-vss/
(not used to post from this forum)
Alex wrote:
> Hi, thank you for the post. This seem to be a great tool, hope we'll get it
> working with backuppc.
>
> I've trie
Hi, thank you for the post. This seem to be a great tool, hope we'll get it
working with backuppc.
I've tried to use it with backuppc running rsync as a daemon on the backuped
comp, but i get an error.
I think it comes from a protocol version compatibility problem (Backuppc use
perl rsync imp
Hi Folks,
Recently I took the patch Elias Penttilä wrote and 'forward-ported' it to rsync
3.
For people who don't know what it does, it implements backup of open files on
Windows with rsync.
Because I think rsync 3 is more efficient and more current in comparison to
rsync 2, it uses
an increm
27 matches
Mail list logo
