Harald Amtmann wrote at about 19:29:07 +0100 on Monday, December 7, 2009:
So, for anyone who cares (doesn't seem to be anyone on this list who
noticed), I found this post from 2006 stating and analyzing my exact problem:
You are assuming something that is not true...
And for the record, I don't necessarily disagree with you that there
are things that can be improved but your attitude is going to get you
less than nowhere. Also, the coders are hardly stupid and there are
good reasons for the various tradeoffs they have made that you would
be wise in
Les Mikesell wrote at about 14:11:12 -0600 on Monday, December 7, 2009:
It applies to full rsync or rsyncd backups. An interrupted full should
be marked as a 'partial' in your backup summary - and the subsequent
full retry should not transfer the completed files again although it
will
So, for anyone who cares (doesn't seem to be anyone on this list who noticed),
I found this post from 2006 stating and analyzing my exact problem:
http://www.topology.org/linux/backuppc.html
On this site, search for Design flaw: Avoidable re-transmission of massive
amounts of data.
For future
Harald Amtmann wrote:
So, for anyone who cares (doesn't seem to be anyone on this list who
noticed), I found this post from 2006 stating and analyzing my exact problem:
http://www.topology.org/linux/backuppc.html
On this site, search for Design flaw: Avoidable re-transmission of massive
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:08:52 -0600
Von: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
An: General list for user discussion,questions and support
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] RsyncP problem
Harald Amtmann wrote
Harald Amtmann wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 13:08:52 -0600
Von: Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com
An: General list for user discussion, questions and support
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Betreff: Re: [BackupPC-users] RsyncP problem
Conf{IncrLevels} are fairly recent additions - be sure you have a
current backuppc version and the code and documentation match. Even
the current version won't find new or moved content if it exists in the
pool, though.
Are you referring to 3.2.0 beta 1 or 3.1.0 as recent version? I am
Harald Amtmann wrote:
Conf{IncrLevels} are fairly recent additions - be sure you have a
current backuppc version and the code and documentation match. Even
the current version won't find new or moved content if it exists in the
pool, though.
Are you referring to 3.2.0 beta 1 or 3.1.0
