Bacula is being added to appliances.
"FreeNAS[1] is a NAS (Network Attached Storage) server supporting:
CIFS, FTP, NFS, RSYNC, SSH, AFP, Unison, UPnP, iSCSI protocols, local
and MS Domain authentication, Software RAID (JBOD,0,1,5), disk
encryption with a Full WEB configuration interface. 32MB o
On Sun, 2007-08-26 at 07:46 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a number of "little" bug fixes that I would like to package together
> and release as version 2.2.1 next weekend, so I ask the developers to
> carefully test any changes (run regression) before committing them.
>
> If p
> If you don't need to grab a subtree then yes, PP is fine. If you do
> its not ideal. I guess i misunderstood the problem, i thought you
> wanted to get "all descendants of a given node". If not, well,
> apologies for the noise. :-)
>
> Yves
Yes, we just want direct children... The purpose is to
On 26 Aug 2007 at 13:28, demerphq wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26 Aug 2007 at 0:52, demerphq wrote:
> [...]
> > > > Can you explain the pros and cons over something like a parent-child
> > > > relationship? That each, each file entry has a link to the parent
On 8/26/07, Marc Cousin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 26 August 2007 00:52:33 demerphq wrote:
[snip]
> > The idea is fairly straight forward, each record has a Left and Right
> > value, any children will have left and right values such that P.Left
> > <= C.left and C.right <=P.right. An in
On 8/26/07, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Aug 2007 at 0:52, demerphq wrote:
[...]
> > > Can you explain the pros and cons over something like a parent-child
> > > relationship? That each, each file entry has a link to the parent
> > > directory. This would be a self referential
On Sunday 26 August 2007 00:52:33 demerphq wrote:
> On 8/25/07, Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 25 Aug 2007 at 10:51, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > On Saturday 25 August 2007 10:31:04 you wrote:
> > > > Hello Marc,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the information. I think this is something
On Sunday 26 August 2007 07:43:25 Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Marc,
>
> I don't yet understand the details of how you use these tables, but it
> seems to me that we could modify the Bacula table structure as follows:
>
> - Split the File table into two new tables:
> - Files containing only file
