> Hello,
>
> I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in
Bacula.
>
Is there a message up on the web that I can link to? I want to email a
few people to let them know that I'll need to do an upgrade, and others
that may not read the list that should probably be aware of thi
>
> I'm still open on this, but I wouldn't release an official patch
without
> having it properly tested, so putting out an untested patch is not
what I
> consider a good solution. Even the current patches are not
"officially"
> released but are attached to an open bug report.
Understood.
> Can
On Monday 10 September 2007 07:52, Masopust, Christian wrote:
> Hi Kern,
>
> i'm not sure if i'm right, but when i remember correctly the discussion
> about the new "red/black restore in memory tree" it should speed up
> building of the restore directory tree a lot. am i right?
Yes. In my tests
Hello,
For your information.
Until we figure out exactly how to resolve old releases containing the restore
bug, I have "hidden" most all of the files that we have released on Source
Forge. That means that they still exist (are not deleted), but cannot be
accessed through the normal download
Hi Kern,
i'm not sure if i'm right, but when i remember correctly the discussion about
the new
"red/black restore in memory tree" it should speed up building of the restore
directory
tree a lot. am i right?
if yes, is there a special option to configure to enable it? i'm asking
because i
Hello,
I would really appreciate it if you would all run regression tests on the
proposed
2.2.3 version, which (hopefully) fixes the restore bug. The fix is in the SVN
in
two places: 1. in the trunk 2. in Branch-2.2
If possible, I prefer testing of the branch, but testing of the trunk woul
On Monday 10 September 2007 01:47, James Harper wrote:
> > At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
>
> there
>
> > is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not --
>
> it
>
> > would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would
>
> requir
On Monday 10 September 2007 04:27, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in
> > Bacula.
> >
> > Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files
> > are missing and thus not restored. T
On Monday 10 September 2007 00:56, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in
> > Bacula.
>
> Well, at least you've got a fix for it =)
Yes. As ugly as it was, once I identified the problem, the fix was rather
On Monday 10 September 2007 00:10, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Kern,
>
> in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I have uploaded patches to bug #935 (bugs.bacula.org) that will correct
> > version 2.2.0, 2.2.1, and 2.2.2. The patch has been tested only on
> > version 2.2.2 and passes all reg
>
> At this time, I do not have a patch for 2.0.x versions, and unless
there
> is some really compelling reason to create one, I would prefer not --
it
> would not be a huge effort to back port the patch, but it would
require
> rather extensive testing.
The only issue I can see with this is that
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Well, at least you've got a fix for it =)
> 8. The data is correctly stored on the Volume, but incorrect index (JobMedia)
> records are stored in the database. (the JobMedia record gener
On Sep 7, 2007, at 7:03 AM, Dan Shearer wrote:
license to GPLv3. Note, even if our license were GPLv3 we could
not use your
code since the GPLed Samba code cannot be used with OpenSSL.
Really sad.
Well yes, except that as Simo pointed out OpenSSL is probably not what
your users want in t
Hello,
I regret to have to announce that there is a rather serious bug in Bacula.
Bacula bug #935 reports that during a restore, a large number of files are
missing and thus not restored. This is really quite surprising because we
have a fairly extensive regression test suite that explicitly t
I managed to create a monster. I have a FreeBSD server running 8
jails. Each jail is running a different database, one of the
following:
MySQL 4
MySQL 5.0
MySQL 5.1
PostgreSQL 7.3
PostgreSQL 7.4
PostgreSQL 8.0
PostgreSQL 8.1
PostgreSQL 8.2
The jails are now running regression tests and they s
15 matches
Mail list logo
