I think that bacula-announce will be enough.
2008/10/25 Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> 1. Change nothing (signing up for bugs and patch notification is already not
>bad).
> 2. Announce patches to the bacula-devel list
> 3. Announce patches to the bacula-devel list and the bacula-use
Hi,
this is a summary reply to distinct parts of this discussion... I hope
it doesn't get too confusing, but as I'm not a developer I believe you
won't find it necessary to reply to most of my thoughts.
25.10.2008 21:53, Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengi
Hi,
Before I continue making changes to bacula I was wondering what the
global consensus is on certain aspects which are on the projects list of
bacula.
Most people might not know me and I must say that I started using Bacula
about 2 months ago. From then on I pushed some changes back to Kern
whi
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 21:11 +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit :
> > On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> > > proced
Le Saturday 25 October 2008 13:41:15 Ulrich Leodolter, vous avez écrit :
> On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> > procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or
> > ours
2008/10/25 Ulrich Leodolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> One thing i am missing are patched packages, rpm and also deb packages
> have a mechanism to include patch files an apply during build process.
>
> For most bacula users it would be much easier to apply patches by "rpm
> -U ..." or "dpkg instal
On Sat, 2008-10-25 at 11:32 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
> procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or
> ourselves), we usually generate a patch, post it to the bug report, if any,
> and up
Hello,
For some time now, I haven't really been happy with the Bacula patch
procedure. Basically, when we fix a bug (either from a bug report or
ourselves), we usually generate a patch, post it to the bug report, if any,
and upload it to the Bacula patches area of Source Forge.
Providing you a
