On Tuesday 10 March 2009 20:16:41 Tomasz Westrych wrote:
> Thanks Kern for advice.
>
> I was able to find out where the problem was.
Great.
>
> For each Autochanger with one drive only Drive Index should = 0.
Hmmm. Yes, I hadn't noticed that. Pretty important :-)
Regards,
Kern
>
> Regards,
>
Thanks Kern for advice.
I was able to find out where the problem was.
For each Autochanger with one drive only Drive Index should = 0.
Regards,
Tomasz
-Wiadomość oryginalna-
Od: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com]
Wysłano: 9 marca 2009 16:32
Do: bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
D
Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:30:58PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> You still haven't answered what your actual goal is, i.e. what (at high
>> level) you're trying to accomplish. There may well be a better way to
>> do it. If we understand what you're trying to do, we'll b
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:34:39AM -0500, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:17:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > >On Monday 09 March 2009 18:39:49 Graham Keeling wrote:
> > > > >>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 12:30:58PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Graham Keeling wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:17:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>> On Monday 09 March 2009 18:39:49 Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Kern Sibb
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:34:39AM -0500, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:17:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > >On Monday 09 March 2009 18:39:49 Graham Keeling wrote:
> > > >>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > >>>On M
Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:17:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> On Monday 09 March 2009 18:39:49 Graham Keeling wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 09 March 2009 17:40:15 Graham Keeling wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:17:23PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >On Monday 09 March 2009 18:39:49 Graham Keeling wrote:
> >>On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 05:56:36PM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>On Monday 09 March 2009 17:40:15 Graham Keeling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hav
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:09:47PM -0400, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Graham Keeling wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have come across some problems involving a single client, a single
> > fileset,
> > and more than one job definition.
> >
> > My setup...
> >
> > Client: myclient
> > FileSet: myfileset
On Tuesday 10 March 2009 08:54:58 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> hi
>
> bacula 2.4.4 on debian etch
>
> is this a normal behaviour?
>
> - start a job, job wants a volume
> - purge a volume
> - list volume, volume state = purged
> - mount
> - job still wants a volume
> - list volume, volume state = recycle
hi
bacula 2.4.4 on debian etch
is this a normal behaviour?
- start a job, job wants a volume
- purge a volume
- list volume, volume state = purged
- mount
- job still wants a volume
- list volume, volume state = recycle
- mount
- job runs
i would expect that the job uses the tape right away a
11 matches
Mail list logo