Re: [Bacula-devel] Storage Daemon hanging, connected to maximum concurrent catalog database connection limit.

2009-11-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Well, this is all a bit too much to digest (as you suggest), but here is what I have figured out. 1. You didn't mention what Bacula version you are using, which makes analysis more difficult. 2. There is (was) a serious editing problem in the batch insert error handling. The code essen

[Bacula-devel] Storage Daemon hanging, connected to maximum concurrent catalog database connection limit.

2009-11-02 Thread Alex Bramley
Hi, This is a new thread for some storage-daemon problems, following on from http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05292.html As described in that post, I had bacula-sd hang on friday with what looked like a race condition. Today, I re-ran the same set of backups (usi

Re: [Bacula-devel] Feature request - bscan from bconsole

2009-11-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello Graham, I have now taken the time to review this, and in short, it is over almost 3600 lines of changes, which would be a very big job to intergrate into the current code base, make work, document, and ensure the stability of the code, so as it stands, we cannot accept it for inclusion in

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-02 Thread wvoice
Hi Eric, First of all, thank you for the quick response. I'd like to see if I understand what you're saying. My first backup should be run as "base". And the remaining ones should be run as "full" so they are differentials of the base? I've gone ahead and made the changes you've suggested and a

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-02 Thread Eric Bollengier
Hello, Le lundi 02 novembre 2009 14:24:00, wvoice a écrit : > Hi, > > I've finished running a set of jobs using the following configuration, > after merging in basejobsv3. The problem is when I run the base level > backup on my 3 windows boxes and set the Base=windemo1,windemo2,windemo3, > the

Re: [Bacula-devel] Base jobs

2009-11-02 Thread wvoice
Hi, I've finished running a set of jobs using the following configuration, after merging in basejobsv3. The problem is when I run the base level backup on my 3 windows boxes and set the Base=windemo1,windemo2,windemo3, the total volume usage is equal to the size of all three individual backups. S

Re: [Bacula-devel] Possible bug with migration/copy jobs run manually from bconsole.

2009-11-02 Thread Alex Bramley
Apologies for the list spam :-( 2009/11/2 Alex Bramley : > I looked through bugzilla and I'm wondering if this is related to > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1371 maybe? If so i'll leave it for > now, as I'm planning to move to 3.0.3 this week. I meant http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1356

Re: [Bacula-devel] Possible bug with migration/copy jobs run manually from bconsole.

2009-11-02 Thread Alex Bramley
Hi again, 2009/10/29 Alex Bramley : > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1399 Can anyone tell me if this will affect jobs run from a schedule in the same manner? Also (and this might be better dealt with in a seperate thread, i'm not sure) I had bacula-sd get into a hung state on friday's test b