Re: [Bacula-devel] Database version upgrade

2010-01-29 Thread Eric Bollengier
Le vendredi 29 janvier 2010 15:20:59, Yuri Timofeev a écrit : > 2010/1/29 Eric Bollengier : > > Le vendredi 29 janvier 2010 11:41:26, Yuri Timofeev a écrit : > >> I looked bvfs API in bacula 5. > >> > >> But I do not know what it may be useful in webacula. > >> > >> For example, for web based inter

Re: [Bacula-devel] Database version upgrade

2010-01-29 Thread Yuri Timofeev
2010/1/29 Eric Bollengier : > Le vendredi 29 janvier 2010 11:41:26, Yuri Timofeev a écrit : >> I looked bvfs API in bacula 5. >> >> But I do not know what it may be useful in webacula. >> >> For example, for web based interface, how to organize the selection of >> file/directory by clicking >> and

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula.spec Logwatch issues

2010-01-29 Thread Moray Henderson
>From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com] >> RPM build errors: >> Bad owner/group: /builddir/build/SPECS/bacula.spec >> >> >> Any immediate ideas? > >I have never seen that problem before, but then I always build as non-root, >so >I don't have permission problems. It looks like you are wor

Re: [Bacula-devel] Database version upgrade

2010-01-29 Thread Eric Bollengier
Le vendredi 29 janvier 2010 11:41:26, Yuri Timofeev a écrit : > I looked bvfs API in bacula 5. > > But I do not know what it may be useful in webacula. > > For example, for web based interface, how to organize the selection of > file/directory by clicking > and then unloaded to a file for process

Re: [Bacula-devel] Database version upgrade

2010-01-29 Thread Yuri Timofeev
I looked bvfs API in bacula 5. But I do not know what it may be useful in webacula. For example, for web based interface, how to organize the selection of file/directory by clicking and then unloaded to a file for processing by Director. With bvfs API that I can see the same hard problem as with

[Bacula-devel] Reschedule On Error blocks other jobs

2010-01-29 Thread Alex Ehrlich
Hello, With Bacula 3.0.3, if I set "Reschedule On Error" to YES then every job rescheduled this way uses up one "concurrent job": it becomes listed in Running Jobs with status "... is waiting for its start time". So when the Director's "Maximum Concurrent Jobs" is set to 5 (default) then if