Hi,
I develop a web-interface for bacula.
I can tell you that I would like to see in Bacula.
You can accept this or not.
First.
Any status or action Bacula should be recorded in the database.
(often Job state in the database and message from the Director is different)
Second.
This applies to th
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 21:41:36 Andreas Piesk wrote:
> Kern Sibbald schrieb:
> > Thanks for your patch. I will apply the parts that apply to bat. It is
> > really too bad that SQLite3 has this bug. However, the solution is OK
> > and does no harm and is a good way to work around their bug.
Kern Sibbald schrieb:
>
> Thanks for your patch. I will apply the parts that apply to bat. It is
> really
> too bad that SQLite3 has this bug. However, the solution is OK and does no
> harm and is a good way to work around their bug.
>
> If you have a few minutes, it might be worthwhile to f
On 02/10/10 14:18, Andreas Piesk wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> while testing things using bat 5.0.0 i found one more sql which doesn't work
> with sqlite3, please
> see bacula-sql.patch (contains all non-working statements i've found so far).
> would changing all 'USING ()' to 'ON ()' break things?
>
>
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 20:18:22 Andreas Piesk wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> while testing things using bat 5.0.0 i found one more sql which doesn't
> work with sqlite3, please see bacula-sql.patch (contains all non-working
> statements i've found so far). would changing all 'USING ()' to 'ON ()'
> b
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 19:23:01 Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:03:46 +0100, Marco van Wieringen said:
> > >
> > > See comments below ...
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 09:48:38 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Kern
Hi list,
while testing things using bat 5.0.0 i found one more sql which doesn't work
with sqlite3, please
see bacula-sql.patch (contains all non-working statements i've found so far).
would changing all 'USING ()' to 'ON ()' break things?
i think i've asked some time ago, why bat has to be run
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 18:23 +, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:03:46 +0100, Marco van Wieringen said:
> >
> > >
> > > See comments below ...
> > >
> > > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 09:48:38 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Ke
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:03:46 +0100, Marco van Wieringen said:
>
> >
> > See comments below ...
> >
> > On Wednesday 10 February 2010 09:48:38 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > >
> > > > The problem is that for some reason cha
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 12:08:57 Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> * Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.02.10 um 08:56 Uhr:
> > Hello,
>
> Hi Kern,
>
> very interesting to hear that more dedup features are in the queue! Great
> news!
>
> [...]
>
> > With all the above, I do not think that it is yet time to d
* Kern Sibbald schrieb am 10.02.10 um 08:56 Uhr:
> Hello,
>
Hi Kern,
very interesting to hear that more dedup features are in the queue! Great
news!
[...]
> With all the above, I do not think that it is yet time to discuss changing
> the
> Bacula Volume format (though a new (second) Volume f
Am Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:23:31 +0100 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
> On Tuesday 09 February 2010 18:08:21 Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Am Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:54:41 +0100 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I don't quite understand this. Perhaps you don't realize that the
>> > next statement after setti
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:00:57AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> OK, I think we are both on the same wavelength now. Thanks.
I don't think we were to much off though I probably already answered your
questions
below in the first email.
>
> See comments below ...
>
> On Wednesday 10 February 201
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:48:38AM +0100, Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello Marco,
> >
> > I think you have completely misunderstood the point of my email and the
> > problem I posed.
> I'm not sure I really understand the probl
OK, I think we are both on the same wavelength now. Thanks.
See comments below ...
On Wednesday 10 February 2010 09:48:38 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello Marco,
> >
> > I think you have completely misunderstood the point of my
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 08:28:25AM +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Marco,
>
> I think you have completely misunderstood the point of my email and the
> problem I posed.
I'm not sure I really understand the problem you are posing. I'm wondering
if it is really a problem (I know it is for you
16 matches
Mail list logo
