More later, but I think there is a problem with the accurate code. Because the
logfile doesn't exist on the subsequent backup, bacula doesn't restore it. I
thought I'd put code in there to prevent that from happening though.
Sent from my iPhone
On 22/09/2010, at 2:46, Graham Keeling wrote:
>
On 9/21/2010 1:15 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
>
> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 18:21:08 Dan Langille wrote:
>> This issue arose on IRC today:
>>
>> 21-Sep 17:41 srv03-fd JobId 250: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected
>> by Storage daemon.
>> Please see http://www.bacula.org/rel-manua
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 20:09:47 Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 09/21/10 13:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 September 2010 18:21:08 Dan Langille wrote:
> >> As part of this work, I'll produce a list of URLs, the topic in
> >> question, and the search terms to look for.
> >
> > OK, that
On 09/21/10 13:15, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 18:21:08 Dan Langille wrote:
>> As part of this work, I'll produce a list of URLs, the topic in question,
>> and the search terms to look for.
>
> OK, that sounds reasonable, but what do you think about my idea of simply
> find
Hello Dan,
On Tuesday 21 September 2010 18:21:08 Dan Langille wrote:
> This issue arose on IRC today:
>
> 21-Sep 17:41 srv03-fd JobId 250: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected
> by Storage daemon.
> Please see http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors
> for help.
> 21-Sep 1
Hello,
Le mardi 21 septembre 2010 10:05:16, Jacek Konieczny a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:18:00PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > We are not longer testing, or supporting the DVD code, simply because so
> > few people use it. It was a very clever implementation, but
> > unfortunately is no
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 02:11:06PM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:12:26AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> > > OK, that sounds easy enough.
> > >
> > > Attached is my patch to bacula-5.0.3 (completely unte
This issue arose on IRC today:
21-Sep 17:41 srv03-fd JobId 250: Fatal error: Authorization key rejected
by Storage daemon.
Please see http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/faq.html#AuthorizationErrors
for help.
21-Sep 17:41 srv03-fd JobId 250: Fatal error: Failed to authenticate
Storage daemon.
This U
hi,
client_only build fails
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/lib/bacula/btraceback.mdb
RPM build errors:
InstallSourcePackage: Header V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID
10a792ad
user sbarn does not exist - using root
user sbarn does not exist - using root
us
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:12:26AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> > OK, that sounds easy enough.
> >
> > Attached is my patch to bacula-5.0.3 (completely untested at the moment).
> >
> > I've made two new options:
> > truncondiff
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:10:08AM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
> OK, that sounds easy enough.
>
> Attached is my patch to bacula-5.0.3 (completely untested at the moment).
>
> I've made two new options:
> truncondiff
> trunconincr
> I will report on whether it works in a while.
Sorry, here is t
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:19:21AM +1000, James Harper wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am testing backups of an Exchange 2003 server, with the plugin. I
> have a
> > schedule of incrementals with occasional virtualfulls.
> >
> > The idea being that, after the first real full, doing a full backup is
>
On Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 09:18:00PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> We are not longer testing, or supporting the DVD code, simply because so few
> people use it. It was a very clever implementation, but unfortunately is not
> so easy to maintain.
> We will be removing the code, probably in the nex
13 matches
Mail list logo
