Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 5.2.1 spec file (dass-it builds)

2011-11-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 11/22/2011 08:08 PM, Bruno Friedmann wrote: > On 11/22/2011 03:48 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >>> Philipp is active here and on -users >>> >>> If you've noticed some issues you should let him know. I've sent him a few >>> reports >>> and he's come back with fixes within a couple of days. >> >>

Re: [Bacula-devel] [PATCH] Adding support for systemd (re-new against Branch-5.2)

2011-11-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 11/22/2011 11:14 PM, Michael Stapelberg wrote: > Hi Bruno and everyone else, > > Please keep in mind that I also submitted a systemd-related patch, though mine > was only for bacula-fd and added socket activation [1]. I’m not sure > if/where/when this has actually been merged, I don’t really ge

Re: [Bacula-devel] [PATCH] Adding support for systemd (re-new against Branch-5.2)

2011-11-22 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Bruno and everyone else, Please keep in mind that I also submitted a systemd-related patch, though mine was only for bacula-fd and added socket activation [1]. I’m not sure if/where/when this has actually been merged, I don’t really get the bacula development/branch model (but I don’t try to, e

Re: [Bacula-devel] [PATCH] Adding support for systemd (re-new against Branch-5.2)

2011-11-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Okay let try now the new version integrating all the remarks. The noticeable change are in bacula-dir.service As systemd care about dependencies we comment the wants database it's fully configured by the configure & make but we let that to the admin responsability (the database could be on anothe

Re: [Bacula-devel] Bacula 5.2.1 spec file (dass-it builds)

2011-11-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 11/22/2011 03:48 AM, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Philipp is active here and on -users >> >> If you've noticed some issues you should let him know. I've sent him a few >> reports >> and he's come back with fixes within a couple of days. > > Once I can sort out what is going on with the postgre p

Re: [Bacula-devel] Dutch translation

2011-11-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 11/22/2011 12:22 PM, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi Davide, No explicitly meaning Bacula-Web, but also the wx-console, traymonitor et al. I saw the bacula.pot file in the .po directory and no Dutch one. Furthermore I try to adopt the Bacula package on Debian. Currently it is non-maintained and

Re: [Bacula-devel] Dutch translation

2011-11-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 11/22/2011 09:09 AM, W. van den Akker wrote: Hi, I want to make a Dutch translation for Bacula. Nice! I didnt see any Dutch .po file so I guess there isn't one. No, currently there is no Dutch .po file. Somebody working on it? No, not to my knowledge. Sometimes users work on things

Re: [Bacula-devel] Dutch translation

2011-11-22 Thread Bacula-Dev
Hi Willem, I guess that you are talking about Bacula-Web dutch translation ? You're right, nobody is working on this language yet ;) A new messages.po file is pretty much ready (a new version of Bacula-Web is coming by next few days). I'll inform all of you about this new translation file asap.

Re: [Bacula-devel] Dutch translation

2011-11-22 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi Davide, No explicitly meaning Bacula-Web, but also the wx-console, traymonitor et al. I saw the bacula.pot file in the .po directory and no Dutch one. Furthermore I try to adopt the Bacula package on Debian. Currently it is non-maintained and stuck on 5.0.3. Recently switched from Amanda to B

[Bacula-devel] Dutch translation

2011-11-22 Thread W. van den Akker
Hi, I want to make a Dutch translation for Bacula. I didnt see any Dutch .po file so I guess there isn't one. Somebody working on it? Can I send the .po to this devel list? greetings, Willem -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to b