Re: [Bacula-devel] git repo details (was shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in)

2021-03-30 Thread Dan Langille
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote: > On 3/30/21 18:50, Dan Langille wrote: > > Which goes back to: why does the repo not have a master branch? > > As long as I remember, we never have used master as branch name. > If you are looking for 11.0, look Branch-11.

Re: [Bacula-devel] git repo details (was shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in)

2021-03-30 Thread Martin Simmons
Yes, I'm using that repo too. As you found out later, you have to switch to the Branch-11.0 branch. __Martin > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 12:50:47 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > Which repo? > > From https://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/, the bottom of the page: > > Clone > http://git.bacul

Re: [Bacula-devel] git repo details (was shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in)

2021-03-30 Thread Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel
On 3/30/21 18:50, Dan Langille wrote: > Which goes back to: why does the repo not have a master branch? As long as I remember, we never have used master as branch name. If you are looking for 11.0, look Branch-11.0. Best Regards, Eric ___ Bacula-deve

Re: [Bacula-devel] git repo details (was shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in)

2021-03-30 Thread Dan Langille
Which repo? From https://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/, the bottom of the page: Clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula.git Side note: why http and not https? While on this topic: https://www.bacula.org/11.0.x-manuals/en/developers/Bacula_Git_Usage.html mentions the master branch. From wha

Re: [Bacula-devel] shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in

2021-03-30 Thread Martin Simmons
>From what Eric said, the script starts with #!/bin/dash to document the fact that it doesn't use bash-specific extensions. Since dash is supposed to be a POSIX-compliant shell, it should be safe to change this to /bin/sh in the FreeBSD package. Even if you add a dependency on dash, you will have

Re: [Bacula-devel] shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in

2021-03-30 Thread Dan Langille
Oh. I think adding another dependency is unwise, but it appears to be a done-deal. I suppose something was valuable in /bin/dash which was not available in /bin/bash. I'll add another dependency to the package. - Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon d...@langille.org > On Mar 30, 2021, at 12:11 PM,

Re: [Bacula-devel] shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in

2021-03-30 Thread Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel
Hello, The program is written in DASH, it may work if you replace it with Bash, but the two shells are not compatible. In the old time, /bin/sh was pointing to bash, but bash is way more powerful than the regular /bin/sh. Then, Ubuntu guys have replaced /bin/sh -> bash by /bin/sh -> dash for perf

Re: [Bacula-devel] shebang fix to scripts/baculabackupreport.in

2021-03-30 Thread Martin Simmons
/bin/dash is another shell, which is typically used as the system shell on Ubuntu and Debian. I'm not sure which repo you are looking at, but my copy has /bin/dash in that file __Martin > On Mon, 29 Mar 2021 14:23:59 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > I tried to create a pull request for you,