On Thursday 09 April 2009 13:30:27 Ulrich Leodolter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 14:27 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello packagers,
> >
> > We will be releasing Bacula version 3.0.0 shortly (within a week or two),
> > so it might be a good time to look at packaging it. There are a
Hello,
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 14:27 +0100, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello packagers,
>
> We will be releasing Bacula version 3.0.0 shortly (within a week or two), so
> it might be a good time to look at packaging it. There are a number of new
> challenges:
>
> 1. Lots of new files added to the "m
Hello,
As the subject line says, Bacula Version 3.0 is now ready. I would appreciate
it if all developers (except for packagers) would ask before committing
anything more. Bug fixes that are unlikely to cause problems, documentation
issues, and packaging fixes are about the only changes we ex
Hello Kern,
RPM handles it's own documentation files with the %doc macro, so I need to
ensure that 'make install' doesn't try to help me.
On Sunday 29 March 2009 09:27:30 am Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello packagers,
>
> We will be releasing Bacula version 3.0.0 shortly (within a week or two),
> so
Hello packagers,
We will be releasing Bacula version 3.0.0 shortly (within a week or two), so
it might be a good time to look at packaging it. There are a number of new
challenges:
1. Lots of new files added to the "make install"
- bat help files
- typical doc type release files (techn
