On Wed, February 17, 2010 9:38 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 14:42:37 Dan Langille wrote:
>> On Wed, February 17, 2010 8:24 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> > Hello Dan,
>> >
>> > There are a number of consistent failures on FreeBSD for Bacula 5.0.1
>> > that you
>> > might wan
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 14:42:37 Dan Langille wrote:
> On Wed, February 17, 2010 8:24 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > There are a number of consistent failures on FreeBSD for Bacula 5.0.1
> > that you
> > might want to look at.
> >
> > The first is the three-pool-test, which co
On Wed, February 17, 2010 8:24 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> There are a number of consistent failures on FreeBSD for Bacula 5.0.1 that
> you
> might want to look at.
>
> The first is the three-pool-test, which consistently fails on FreeBSD. It
> looks like it is either getting a seek
Hello Dan,
There are a number of consistent failures on FreeBSD for Bacula 5.0.1 that you
might want to look at.
The first is the three-pool-test, which consistently fails on FreeBSD. It
looks like it is either getting a seek error or the seek address returned is
incorrect. Bacula detects a
