Apologies for the list spam :-(
2009/11/2 Alex Bramley :
> I looked through bugzilla and I'm wondering if this is related to
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1371 maybe? If so i'll leave it for
> now, as I'm planning to move to 3.0.3 this week.
I meant http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1356
Hi again,
2009/10/29 Alex Bramley :
> http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1399
Can anyone tell me if this will affect jobs run from a schedule in the
same manner?
Also (and this might be better dealt with in a seperate thread, i'm
not sure) I had bacula-sd get into a hung state on friday's test
b
Hi,
2009/10/29 Kern Sibbald :
> I recommend that you submit this as a bug report. That is the best way to
> ensure that it is properly dealt with.
Done!
http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1399
Hope that helps -- I tried to cut down the quantity of information in
the report a little.
--Alex
-
Hello,
This looks like a bug to me, especially since it is easily the kind of problem
that shows up where one job starts another, and we didn't think to pass on
command line overrides. Aside from that problem, it seems to me that the
error messages abou the "Job not run" are not really suffici
Hello list,
I'm implementing disk-to-disk-to-tape backups with bacula 3.0.2, using
copy jobs to duplicate the disk-to-disk jobs to tape for off-site
storage. I'm running into a problem when I manually run the copy job
in that it only copies the *last* of the set of job id's to tape.
I'm using thi
