On 10/08/10 18:09, Attila Fülöp wrote:
> Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> ...Then again, I could have just made a stupid, trivial configuration
>> error on the secondary MySQL server I was loading the restored shapshots
>> onto. But none of us ever do that, do we...?
>
> Phil,
>
> I don't thinks so. I'
Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/08/10 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 10/08/10 10:42, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> So, as I mentioned a little while back, I've been playing around with
>>> snapshot-based backups of MySQL. The key to success is knowing how to
>>> properly quiesce InnoDB tables. I
On 10/08/10 13:19, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 10/08/10 10:42, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> So, as I mentioned a little while back, I've been playing around with
>> snapshot-based backups of MySQL. The key to success is knowing how to
>> properly quiesce InnoDB tables. I still have a bunch of consis
On 10/08/10 10:42, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> So, as I mentioned a little while back, I've been playing around with
> snapshot-based backups of MySQL. The key to success is knowing how to
> properly quiesce InnoDB tables. I still have a bunch of consistency
> testing to do, but it's looking very pr
So, as I mentioned a little while back, I've been playing around with
snapshot-based backups of MySQL. The key to success is knowing how to
properly quiesce InnoDB tables. I still have a bunch of consistency
testing to do, but it's looking very promising indeed. It should work
on any underlying