Hello Graham,
I have spent some time reviewing this bug. Thanks for the database and conf
file, I was able to easily reproduce what you saw.
It seems to me that there are three problems here -- unfortunately all
possibly quite serious:
1. The Volume is corrupt.
2. When Bacula reads the corrup
Somebody on the bacula-users list is having a similar problem whilst trying to
run a verify job on a VirtualFull.
Here is his message:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 09:02:11AM +0100, Fahrer, Julian wrote:
> I am currently trying to implement verify jobs at a customer's site.
> At that site I am running
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:17:17PM +0100, Robin O'Leary wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:36:12 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:11:46PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > > Le Tuesday 15
>From what I see with bacula it corrects for clock skew. I haven't seen
message from my linux or unix hosts about the clock but they are all in
sync with NTP.
This is a grep of clock from my bacula log, you can see where it adjust
for the clock skew on the windows boxes:
15-Sep 22:39 pc-renesas-f
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:36:12 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:11:46PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:52 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > > On Tu
Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 18:36:12 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:11:46PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:52 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > > Le Tu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 06:11:46PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:52 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 15:59:22 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > > As fa
Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 17:34:52 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 15:59:22 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > As far as I can see it, that would solve many problems - it won't all
> > > go
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 04:48:03PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 15:59:22 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > As far as I can see it, that would solve many problems - it won't all go
> > wrong if the director's clock changes,
>
> I don't understand the problem with
Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 15:59:22 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:57:48 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > > Le Tu
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:03:57AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:57:48 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:41:07 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > > On Mo
Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:57:48 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:41:07 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > > Perha
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:49:38AM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:41:07 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > Perhaps we should avoid to make a VirtualFull when we have only one Full
> > > backup
Le Tuesday 15 September 2009 09:41:07 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Perhaps we should avoid to make a VirtualFull when we have only one Full
> > backup in the job list or mark the new job as a Copy.
>
> The same thing happen
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 06:44:25PM +0200, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Perhaps we should avoid to make a VirtualFull when we have only one Full
> backup in the job list or mark the new job as a Copy.
The same thing happens whenever you make the VirtualFull, after Fulls,
Differentials or Incrementals.
Hello,
I think I have found a bug that is very easy to reproduce.
I do a full backup (JobId 1).
I do a virtualfull backup (JobId 2).
I then go to bconsole, and type
'restore'
I select option '12: Select full restore to a specified JobId'.
I type '2', to get JobId '2', but bacula selects JobId '1
Hello,
Le Monday 14 September 2009 18:19:44 Graham Keeling, vous avez écrit :
> Hello,
> I think I have found a bug that is very easy to reproduce.
In this mode, the VirtualFull backup has the same time attributes than the last
selected backup (normally an Incrental or a Differential).
When you
17 matches
Mail list logo
