Here you go, nothing unusual that I see:
2006-10-19 00:55:35 1GaQqg-0003kR-Tp = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
H=eagle.netwrx1.com [68.248.203.41] I=[192.168.1.1]:25 P=smtp S=2504
2006-10-19 00:55:40 1GaQqg-0003kR-Tp = georgek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=procmail T=procmail
2006-10-19 00:55:44 1GaQqg-0003kR-Tp =
I'm trying to use a fifo for backup/restore.
I have the storage set up for min and max block size = 1024.
My runbeforejob script uses dd with ibs=1024 obs=1024 conv=sync, to pull
the data from the fifo and save it to a file (saving to the file is just
an interim test setup; I'll do something
I wonder if we couldn't require a $10 donation to the project every time
someone forgets to include the Bacula version? I'd probably be a
multi-millionaire by now. :-)
It looks like you are running some 1.39 version, and any FIFO use for the
Device type is likely to be broken as there is no
I'm sorry about that. The version is 1.38.9.
Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like Fifo is EOL'd as far as support
in the code goes?
Actually, my purpose in using Fifo's is to use bacula for archiving to
DVD in addition to doing backups.
The problem I'm solving is that I've already been
An earlier message in this group sparked a question in my mind.
What type of error detection and error correction algorithms are
implemented in Bacula?
While working for Hewlett-Packard's tape backup group (many years ago),
we were taught (brainwashed?) that tape was an inherently error prone
I'm sorry about that. The version is 1.38.9.
Thanks for the feedback. It sounds like Fifo is EOL'd as far as support
in the code goes?
Actually, my purpose in using Fifo's is to use bacula for archiving to
DVD in addition to doing backups.
The problem I'm solving is that I've already
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:58:15AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006 at 7:54, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:36:50AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006 at 7:29, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:24:57AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 19
Hi,
On 10/21/2006 12:29 PM, Florian Bachmann wrote:
Hi,
we are looking into replacing our existing backup solution, with Bacula
being one of the contenders. I have been experimenting a bit with both
the stable (1.38.11) and beta (1.39.26) series, and I must say I am
quite impressed
On 22 Oct 2006 at 13:33, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:58:15AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006 at 7:54, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:36:50AM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
On 20 Oct 2006 at 7:29, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Fri, Oct 20, 2006
I will be out of the office starting Fri 20/10/2006 and will not return
until Fri 27/10/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more
Martin Simmons wrote:
snip stuff
Looks strange, unless the LastWritten dates are wrong. Which version of
Bacula is this?
Also, just to be clear, on 2006-10-14 you were expecting it to use A006,
A007, B001 and B002 but it actually used B001 and A007 and
then tried to
11 matches
Mail list logo
