Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

2007-01-08 Thread Chris Rodgers
To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the moment, it looks like the director cancels the job but leaves the stor

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 10:10, Chris Rodgers wrote: > To my mind, the correct behaviour would be for the director to terminate > the job after FDConnectTimeout has elapsed and then to inform the > storage daemon that the job has been cancelled / had an error. At the > moment, it l

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote: > I solved this problem myself. I'm not sure how elegant the solution > is, however. > > Using myphpadmin I changed the "JobStatus" field in the respective > jobid's mysql entry from "f" to "T". I then re-ran the job and it > picked up mo

Re: [Bacula-users] Backup more than on client within a job

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Jonathan Horne wrote: > getting back OT... can bacula run multiple clients simultaneously? Yes. > and, so far ive not read that it cant be done, but one of my clients is > a linux running on ppc... Bacula-fd (the client) compiled for linux-ppc (ubuntu) works fine here. -

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Silver Salonen wrote: > To me it sounds very.. um.. important. I've had similar situations, but with > 20-30 GB, so it hasn't been SO critical (only sufficiently as I do backups > via WAN). I've had it happen 700Gb into 1Tb backups. There's a few good reasons to keep backup s

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling of backup to disk

2007-01-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 1/8/2007 11:46 AM, Alan Brown wrote: > On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > >>In theory, a 600 GB tape with a 200 GB spool file would be filled in >>three chunks. As the sizes never add up that well, and the actual tape >>capacity is never that exact, you will find that it takes th

Re: [Bacula-users] BUG?: BackupCatalog waiting to reserve a device

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Please always copy the email list. On Monday 08 January 2007 10:32, Chris Rodgers wrote: > > It appears that you have a rather unique case, since many other users > > including myself rely on Bacula continuing when a client cannot be contacted. > > It wouldn't surprise me. I guess that

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling of backup to disk

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Sat, 6 Jan 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > In theory, a 600 GB tape with a 200 GB spool file would be filled in > three chunks. As the sizes never add up that well, and the actual tape > capacity is never that exact, you will find that it takes three or four > despooling turns which doesn't sound t

[Bacula-users] Problem sending mails with bsmtp

2007-01-08 Thread Andreas Lüdtke
Hi, when a job finishes and an e-mail should be sent I get the following error message: 08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: ../../lib/message.c:472 Mail prog: bsmtp: ../../tools/bsmtp.c:329 Fatal connect error to smtp.mail.com: ERR=No error 08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: Backup.2007-01-08_13.27.42 Error: ../../lib/me

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread Pedro Sepúlveda
John Drescher escribió: >> Is it possible to configure bacula to use both of these autochangers >> with 2 concurrent backup jobs? >> > Yes it is. Have you set Maximum Concurrent Jobs in the director, the > filedaemon and the storage daemon? Also are you using tapes from more > than one pool? > > ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Network error on data channel

2007-01-08 Thread Erich Prinz
It's been so long ago I set this up I had to go look... Heartbeat Interval = 300 ... Try that out. Erich On Jan 7, 2007, at 10:35 PM, Charles Galpin wrote: > Thanks Erich, > > On Jan 7, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Erich Prinz wrote: > >> >> We can't expect Bacula to resolve our networking issues! > >

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread Aaron Knister
Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from that backup set did work. On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote: >> I solved this problem myself. I'm not s

[Bacula-users] Newbie Problem with Alert

2007-01-08 Thread Andreas Lüdtke
Hi, I've a little problem with the "Alert" command. I changed the default configuration to reflect my hardware. When I run a job I get the following messages: 08-Jan 13:28 srv-sd: Alert: cannot open SCSI device '*None*' - No such file or directory 08-Jan 13:28 srv-sd: 3997 Bad alert command: ta

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 8 Jan 2007 at 8:22, Aaron Knister wrote: > On Jan 8, 2007, at 4:29 AM, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > > On Sunday 07 January 2007 23:03, Aaron Knister wrote: > >> I solved this problem myself. I'm not sure how elegant the solution > >> is, however. > >> > >> Using myphpadmin I changed the "JobStatus"

Re: [Bacula-users] Newbie: tape test under windows

2007-01-08 Thread Erich Prinz
Same problem here. Seems to me the default install should include appropriate credentials for device access. btape and running a bacula job both fail with permission denied. Any ideas? E On Jan 7, 2007, at 4:01 PM, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 >

[Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Gavin Conway
Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon refused to start until I'd created a /var/run/bacula directory. Either I've missed a step or this

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Erich Prinz
Very Interesting. The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug? Erich On Jan 8, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Gavin Conway wrote

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Richard Mortimer
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 14:02 +, Gavin Conway wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > Did you previously use the Debian packages or did you compile yourself? You should be aware that the Debia

[Bacula-users] How to use tapeinfo under Windows?

2007-01-08 Thread Andreas Lüdtke
I still have problems with the "tapeinfo" command. I always get the message "No such file or directory". Can comeone please tell me how to use this command under windows? I'm using a Quantum SCSI DLT-V4 tape drive. Thanks Andreas --

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread John Drescher
> I have good the bacula-fd, bacula-sd and bacula-dir files, but I only > have one pool every night. Need I more than one pool for have twho > concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives? > I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to use more than one pool beca

Re: [Bacula-users] Concurrent backup jobs in an autochager with two drives

2007-01-08 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, John Drescher wrote: > I believe if you want to use both drives at the same time you have to > use more than one pool because the second job will want to use the > tape that is in the first drive and because it can't unload the tape > from the first drive it will wait till the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Gavin Conway
Erich Prinz wrote: > Very Interesting. > > The docs show /var/run/bacula as one of the directories that must me > manually created prior to installing. What is interesting to me is you > had a working system prior to an in-place upgrade. Still think it's a bug? > > Erich I still see it as a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Gavin Conway
Richard Mortimer wrote: > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you may > get better mileage out of them. Many thanks, as mentione

[Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Amiche
Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job using this volume to mark it as Used,and not immediatly after the last job.

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Bill Moran
In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status > of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the next job > using > this volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread James Cort
Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the >> status of >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. >> So I defined "Volume Use Duration = 10h" but Bacula wait for the n

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 8 Jan 2007 at 16:36, James Cort wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > In response to Amiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > >> Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the > >> status of > >> the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. > >> So I def

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread jltallon
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 14:02:55 +, Gavin Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Possible bug. Ran the configure, make, make install as expected. > Configured the systems using the old configs (in-place upgrade). > > The director and file-daemon started first time. The storage daemon > refused to s

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling of backup to disk

2007-01-08 Thread Per Andreas Buer
Alan Brown wrote: > Note that the attribute spooling directory should be on a separate > filesystem to the data spooling - if the data spool fills up, Bacula will > flush it. If the attribute spool fills up the job aborts. > How big does the attribute spool have to be? Any guidelines? Per.

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 14:22, Aaron Knister wrote: > Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be > ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from that backup > set did work. Yes, I was sarcastic, but life is (at least I am) like that. I certainly didn't mean

Re: [Bacula-users] "resume" failed job

2007-01-08 Thread mark . bergman
In the message dated: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 18:19:37 +0100, The pithy ruminations from Kern Sibbald on were: => On Monday 08 January 2007 14:22, Aaron Knister wrote: => > Thanks for the sarcasm. NOT. I come here for support, not to be => > ridiculed. And i'll have you know that the restore from th

[Bacula-users] rpm spec file for 2.0 needs updating

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Nelson
Trying to build 2.0 for CentOS4, I "%define centos4 1" and do rpmbuild -ba bacula.spec and it spits out: # rpmbuild -ba bacula.spec error: You must specify a platform. Please examine the spec file. error: line 129: Unknown tag: exit 1 Same if I try "%define rhel4 1". It seems to be because neit

Re: [Bacula-users] rpm spec file for 2.0 needs updating

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Nelson
I got it to start building with this instead of modifying the spec file: rpmbuild -ba --define "build_centos4 1" --define "build_mysql 1" --define "mysql4 1" bacula.spec I guess you are not supposed to modify the spec, but jus' inspec' it? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and danger

Re: [Bacula-users] Newbie: tape test under windows

2007-01-08 Thread Erich Prinz
Problem solved. This is pretty embarrassing for me. The software that is going to be replaced was still running on the system. Once that (and Bacula) services were stopped, btape and mt run fine. Erich On Jan 8, 2007, at 1:30 AM, Andreas Lüdtke wrote: >>> Tape block granularity is 1024 byte

Re: [Bacula-users] Newbie: tape test under windows

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Nelson
On Mon, January 8, 2007 11:59 am, Erich Prinz wrote: > Problem solved. > > This is pretty embarrassing for me. The software that is going to be > replaced was still running on the system. Once that (and Bacula) > services were stopped, btape and mt run fine. Heh... I had something similar happen.

[Bacula-users] No message from tray-monitor for backup-dir

2007-01-08 Thread Quanzhong Zhang
Hello, Could you help me? There is no any "backup-dir" message display from the "Bacula tray monitor" (except the title line). But when I issued the "status dir" command on console, the result is correct. The messages of "backup-fd" and "backup-sd" from the "Bacula tray monitor" is OK.

[Bacula-users] Autochanger using disk-changer problems.

2007-01-08 Thread Joshua Colson
Hello Everyone, I'm new to Bacula and I'm having some trouble configuring an Autochanger using the disk-changer script. I'm using Bacula version 1.38.11 installed from RPM on SuSE 10.1 (x86_64). I've gone through the "Brief Tutorial" on the bacula.org site and everything went fine. Now I'm trying

[Bacula-users] 1.38.11 to 2.0 ... is there a path back?

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Nelson
I am interested in trying 2.0. I am currently running 1.38.11 successfully on two different backup servers, but honestly it has been quite a chore trying to keep the one with the Autochanger running. I understand that it is necessary to convert the database format (mysql) when moving from 1.38 to

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-2.0.0 rpm release

2007-01-08 Thread Felix Schwarz
Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb RPM is a noarch package (which is only not labeled as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb packages released by Scott. I had some problems with my UTMS connection and releaseforg

Re: [Bacula-users] No message from tray-monitor for backup-dir

2007-01-08 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 1/8/2007 11:19 AM, Quanzhong Zhang wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Could you help me? Let's see... I've never used the tray monitor, and I have not looked up its manual, so I could be wrong, but... > There is no any “backup-dir” message display from the “Bacula tray > monitor” (excep

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.11 to 2.0 ... is there a path back?

2007-01-08 Thread Felix Schwarz
Michael Nelson schrieb: > I am nervous though. If 2.0 doesn't work out, will I have a way to get > back to what does work (1.38.11)? If I just make copies of all the stuff > in /etc/bacula and /var/lib/mysql/bacula and /var/bacula will that be > enough to let me get back to where I am now? Inst

Re: [Bacula-users] 1.38.11 to 2.0 ... is there a path back?

2007-01-08 Thread Michael Nelson
On Mon, January 8, 2007 2:05 pm, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Michael Nelson schrieb: >> I am nervous though. If 2.0 doesn't work out, will I have a way to get >> back to what does work (1.38.11)? If I just make copies of all the >> stuff >> in /etc/bacula and /var/lib/mysql/bacula and /var/bacula wi

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-2.0.0 rpm release

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
Many thanks Felix :-) On Monday 08 January 2007 23:01, Felix Schwarz wrote: > > Just a short note that my Fedora/CentOS RPMs are released, too. The updatedb RPM is a > noarch package (which is only not labeled > as such due to technical restrictions of rpm). You can use one of the updatedb pack

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem sending mails with bsmtp

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 13:56, Andreas Lüdtke wrote: > Hi, > > when a job finishes and an e-mail should be sent I get the following error message: > > 08-Jan 13:28 srv-dir: ../../lib/message.c:472 Mail prog: bsmtp: ../../tools/bsmtp.c:329 > Fatal connect error to smtp.mail.com: ERR=No error >

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula DVD configs/version

2007-01-08 Thread Richard Mortimer
All, On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:11 +0100, Mario Ohnewald wrote: > Hello Richard, > > i am trouble getting bacula with DVD as a backup media working. > > You said that you are doing it that way and that it works fine. :) > What bacula Version are you using? What dvd+rw-tools version do you have? >

[Bacula-users] TLS

2007-01-08 Thread orlakwahr
Hello, I have configured bacula according to http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_TLS_Communication.html backups are fine, but restores are failing with: RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Fatal error: Authorization problem: Remote server requires TLS. RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Error: Ba

Re: [Bacula-users] TLS

2007-01-08 Thread Dan Langille
On 9 Jan 2007 at 3:42, orlakwahr wrote: > Hello, > > I have configured bacula according to > http://www.bacula.org/dev-manual/Bacula_TLS_Communication.html > backups are fine, but restores are failing with: > > RestoreFiles.2007-01-09_03.09.10 Fatal error: Authorization problem: Remote > server

[Bacula-users] Restore behavior

2007-01-08 Thread Ralf Winkler
First of all, let me wish you all a happy new year. We are using Bacula in the version 1.39.11. Yesterday we had to do a restore. Everything works fine and all backuped data could be restored. But during the restore, bacula had a strange behavior. We do the backup to a file. Bacula read the fil

Re: [Bacula-users] Bug - Bacula 2.0 and Debian Sarge 3.1

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:01, Gavin Conway wrote: > Richard Mortimer wrote: > > FWIW José Luis Tallón uploaded Debian packages to Sourceforge earlier > > today. http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=50727 > > I am not sure if these are built against stable or testing but you ma

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use duration

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 08 January 2007 16:35, Amiche wrote: > Whan bacula start the backup of the night on a tape volume, I want the status of > the volume pass immediatly as Used when the last job is terminated. Bacula changes the status only the next time it wants to use the volume. > So I defined "Volume

Re: [Bacula-users] Restore behavior

2007-01-08 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 09 January 2007 04:53, Ralf Winkler wrote: > First of all, let me wish you all a happy new year. > > We are using Bacula in the version 1.39.11. > > Yesterday we had to do a restore. > Everything works fine and all backuped data could be restored. > But during the restore, bacula had a