[Bacula-users] I need an older bacula windows version, or... ?

2007-10-28 Thread Michael Lewinger
Hello, The newer versions of the bacula file daemon do not work properly on pre-unicode windows versions - the filenames became unusable when written to the 2.2.5 server catalog, where all non-utf characters were stripped out of the filename. I'm speaking specifically about Hebrew file names but

Re: [Bacula-users] iSCSI-Tape problems

2007-10-28 Thread Wolfgang Denk
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: Curious as to why tar worked when btape did not, I found this. For portability reasons, tar appears to always use a physical block size of 512 bytes. See http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_73.html. Perhaps that explains the

Re: [Bacula-users] prevent bacula to backup recently restored files

2007-10-28 Thread Martin Vogt
On 10/24/07, Michael Short [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just make sure that the files have an older creation/modification date and bacula will ignore them. thx Is there a way to configure bacula to only backup files which have a changed mtime?

Re: [Bacula-users] prevent bacula to backup recently restored files

2007-10-28 Thread Chris Howells
On Sun, October 28, 2007 5:54 pm, Martin Vogt wrote: Is there a way to configure bacula to only backup files which have a changed mtime? mtimeonly=yes—no If enabled, tells the Client that the selection of #64257;les during Incremental and Di#64256;erential backups should based only on the

Re: [Bacula-users] SQL errors after upgrade from 1.36 to 2.2.5

2007-10-28 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Search the list. IIRC, there is a minimum PostgreSQL version associated with Bacula 2.2.x Disaster wrote: Dear all, after an upgrade I get those error (via Bacula daemon message). I've upgraded from 1.36 to 2.2.5 on gentoo running postgres (I've