Well, I got the following to work using gnu date:
File = "|gdate -d yesterday '+d:/path_to_app/%Y%m%%d.bak'"
note the %d has an extra % - bacula translates %d into the name of the
director daemon prior to executing the script. Fortunately, it also
translates %% into %
Thanks,
Hmm, seems like a catalog problem. When I list all the backups for this client
I get
this (shortened format):
+---+--+---+-++
| JobId | Client | Level | StartTime | VolumeName |
+---+--+---+-+---
Hi Guys,
I am using Bacula 2.6 with Windows Server 2003.
Sorry for such a simple query, but I can not find any specifics to enabling
TLS on Windows anywhere. The backups work fine other than MD5 hashing, (but
that's another story) I found a wiki
(http://www.devco.net/pubwiki/Bacula/TLS/bco
I marked two directories to restore and the restore went like this:
20-Dec 16:32 buckeye-dir JobId 1678: Start Restore Job
RestoreFiles.2007-12-20_16.32.41
20-Dec 16:32 buckeye-dir JobId 1678: Using Device "VXA3drive"
20-Dec 16:34 buckeye-sd JobId 1678: Ready to read from volume "Monthly-4" on
d
> can you please write which version of bacula and windows you use?
I apologize for leaving out this important bit of information, I was
using Bacula file daemon version 2.2.5, Bacula storage daemon version
2.2.5, and a Bacula director version 2.2.6.
Also, I would like to point out that I am usin
Hi,
20.12.2007 23:44,, David Gardner wrote::
>
> It's happened again...I get a successful backup to tape (Yeah!) then
> Bacula 2.2.15 blows away spool directory. This never (ever!) happens on
> successful BU's to "File."
>
I have never encountered such an issue... and I don't understand why
i
It's happened again...I get a successful backup to tape (Yeah!) then Bacula
2.2.15 blows away spool directory. This never (ever!) happens on successful
BU's to "File."
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
David Gardner
email: djgardner(at)yahoo.com
Yahoo! IM: djgardner
AIM
Hello,
Thanks for your replies. I've not changed permissions on these files
since the 2.03 update, here's what they are:
total 16
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4357 May 25 2007 bacula.example.crt
-rw-r- 1 root wheel 887 May 25 2007 bacula.example.key
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1659 May
Michael Galloway wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:17:36PM -0500, Robin Blanchard wrote:
>> I'm currently in the testing phase with LTO-3 (full multitape changer
>> test currently ongoing) and am seeing:
>>
>> Wrote blk_block=4835000, dev_blk_num=3000 VolBytes=311,915,455,488
>> rate=4475.5 KB/s
Hi,
20.12.2007 16:50,, Michael Galloway wrote::
> yes, that may work, really all i wanted to do was add some excludes, so
> i think i should be ok :-|
Topposting... bah. You'll have to work with my trimmed quote now ;-)
What I do from time to time is the following:
Modify the new fileset,
Initia
Hi,
20.12.2007 06:57,, asa wrote::
> I have an old set of volumes written with the backup type I would like
> to import into my new bacula 2.0 setup. I run the bscan fun and
> afterwards the volumes do not show up in a list volumes command.
>
> I run bscan -V ProjectBackup_B_0001\|ProjectBac
On Saturday, 15 December 2007 16:02:40 -0500,
Michael Galloway wrote:
> > Now I'm trying to perform backups operations. I've noticed when I
> > try label a volume, Bacula uses the slot 0 and then it causes a
> > mount error.
> > *label
> > Automatically selected Storage: DLTDrive
> > Enter new V
Dave wrote:
> Hello,
> I posted this a while back, but i have additional information on it.
> I've been having an issue about bacula since upgrading from 2.03 to
> 2.2.x. I'm running bacula with tls communications for all daemons. THis is
> on a FreeBSD 6.x machine, all three daemons. I'm a
Hello,
I posted this a while back, but i have additional information on it.
I've been having an issue about bacula since upgrading from 2.03 to
2.2.x. I'm running bacula with tls communications for all daemons. THis is
on a FreeBSD 6.x machine, all three daemons. I'm able to start the file
Andy, this is a hack but you could perhaps write a shell script to
generate the file name and put it in a text file. Then in your FileSet
stanza pull in the text file as your File resource.
On Dec 20, 2007 9:50 AM, Andy Rude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hey all -
>
> I have bacula running succ
Thanks Drew - you hit the nail on the head. There are other files bak files
I don't want backed up from that directory.
-Original Message-
From: Drew Bentley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 11:19 AM
To: Andy Rude
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subje
On Dec 20, 2007 11:50 AM, Andy Rude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hey all -
>
> I have bacula running succesfully on multiple OS. I have a windows app that
> does its own backups to a file like "20071219.bak". I'd like to be able to
> come up with some sort of fileset that will be able to back
On Dec 20, 2007 10:04 AM, Conny Brunnkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I've had a problem haunt me a couple of times as I add clients:
>
> after a new client/job is added, when the first initial job is run, it
> is naturally upgraded from Inc to Full. So far, so good. But the
> problem is that
Hey all -
I have bacula running succesfully on multiple OS. I have a windows app that
does its own backups to a file like "20071219.bak". I'd like to be able to
come up with some sort of fileset that will be able to back yesterdays file
up daily. Do you know of any wildfile options or sh one l
I think that you're far from an idiot. The IBM driver might be
required going forward for the LTO-4 native tape encryption.
I am glad you're working and if you do get the LTO-4 tape encryption
working please let me know how, hopefully not something that only works
on IBM tape drives as I have H
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:17:36PM -0500, Robin Blanchard wrote:
> I'm currently in the testing phase with LTO-3 (full multitape changer
> test currently ongoing) and am seeing:
>
> Wrote blk_block=4835000, dev_blk_num=3000 VolBytes=311,915,455,488
> rate=4475.5 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=484, de
I've realised that i'm an idiot, Ditches the ibm drives, restarted the
library.
All working now.
Thank you Jason.
Dec 20 17:12:07 backup lin_taped[3344]: lin_taped terminated.
Dec 20 17:12:10 backup kernel: lin_tape 1.10.0 is unloaded.
Dec 20 17:12:27 backup kernel: mptsas: ioc0: removing ss
On Dec 20, 2007 12:17 PM, Robin Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm currently in the testing phase with LTO-3 (full multitape changer
> test currently ongoing) and am seeing:
>
> Wrote blk_block=4835000, dev_blk_num=3000 VolBytes=311,915,455,488
> rate=4475.5 KB/s
> Wrote blk_block=484,
I have a new LTO-4 library and LTO-3 tapes. I have changed the buffers
around and I am using a 1MB block size. The best I have been able to
get on a single client backup is 89MB/sec on a ~300GB backup to a LTO-3
tape.
I found that most of my clients max out at 25MB/sec. If backup 6
clients at a
I'm currently in the testing phase with LTO-3 (full multitape changer
test currently ongoing) and am seeing:
Wrote blk_block=4835000, dev_blk_num=3000 VolBytes=311,915,455,488
rate=4475.5 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=484, dev_blk_num=8000 VolBytes=312,238,015,488
rate=4475.6 KB/s
Wrote blk_block=48450
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 06:05:03PM +0100, Ralf Gross wrote:
>
> For full backups I get 70-75MB/s write speed to LTO-4 tape. Spooling
> seems to make not much difference here. The overall backup speed
> (whole job) drops with spooling enabled, because it's asynchron for
> single jobs (spooling -> d
Here (to compare) under an old suse 9.1 installed on IBM x235 server
(Intel Xeon 3.2 HT + 4Go Ram + ibm serveraid 6M (scsi) + 6 hdd in raid5 (u320
10.000tr/m)
xfs filesystem backuped to QUANTUM SDLT320 TAPE
The machine is SD & FD bacula (dir is on another PC)
Elapsed time: 2 hours 9
Michael Galloway schrieb:
> out of curiosity, i'm wondering what other folks are getting for backup rates
> to LTO4. i seem to be getting these sorts of rates:
>
> local disk backups (3ware raid6 9650SE sata disks/xfs filesystem):
> Elapsed time: 8 hours 22 mins
> Priority:
sorry, should have added, this is bacula 2.2.6 patched and
2.2.6 client.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:28:24AM -0500, Michael Galloway wrote:
> good day all,
>
> out of curiosity, i'm wondering what other folks are getting for backup rates
> to LTO4. i seem to be getting these sorts of rates:
>
>
Excellent metrics. We've got an InfiniBand card on order so we'll let
you know what we get when it's installed.
On Dec 20, 2007 8:28 AM, Michael Galloway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> good day all,
>
> out of curiosity, i'm wondering what other folks are getting for backup rates
> to LTO4. i seem t
good day all,
out of curiosity, i'm wondering what other folks are getting for backup rates
to LTO4. i seem to be getting these sorts of rates:
local disk backups (3ware raid6 9650SE sata disks/xfs filesystem):
Elapsed time: 8 hours 22 mins
Priority: 10
FD Files Wri
Hi all!
I get following errors, as i try to backup some of my servers:
20-Dec 17:04 backupserver-dir JobId 146: BeforeJob: run command
"/etc/bacula/scripts/create-bootstrap-dir dbserver"
20-Dec 17:04 backupserver-dir JobId 146: Start Backup JobId 146,
Job=dbserver_backup.2007-12-20_17.03.15
20
Hi, I've had a problem haunt me a couple of times as I add clients:
after a new client/job is added, when the first initial job is run, it
is naturally upgraded from Inc to Full. So far, so good. But the
problem is that for large jobs, that take more time than one Inc-cycle
to finish, the ne
Hi guys,
Just wondering if anyone had any experience with using Bacula and the
IBM TS3100 (ULT3580-TD4) autochanger with the 3573-TL LTO-4 tape drive?
I'm running Debian etch with Kernel 2.6.18-4amd64 and I have a IBM
TS3100 connected via SAS to a LSILogic SAS3801X with theIBM
lin_tape-1.10.0
Michael Galloway wrote:
> hmmm ...
>
> anyway to modify a fileset and not have the entire backup promoted to full?
Yes, add
Ignore FileSet Changes = "yes"
to your fileset.
The problem is that this won't work this time, since
the fileset already changed (even adding this directive
changes it),
yes, that may work, really all i wanted to do was add some excludes, so
i think i should be ok :-|
-- michael
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:42:57PM +0100, Annette Jäkel wrote:
> Michael Galloway schrieb:
> > hmmm ...
> >
> > anyway to modify a fileset and not have the entire backup promoted to full?
That will do it, but I would be careful using that directive.
On Dec 20, 2007 7:42 AM, Annette Jäkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Galloway schrieb:
>
> > hmmm ...
> >
> > anyway to modify a fileset and not have the entire backup promoted to full?
> > i have a large backup, 1.8T, that i'd l
Michael Galloway schrieb:
> hmmm ...
>
> anyway to modify a fileset and not have the entire backup promoted to full?
> i have a large backup, 1.8T, that i'd like to make a few changes to the file
> set.
>
> -- michael
>
> -
> T
hmmm ...
anyway to modify a fileset and not have the entire backup promoted to full?
i have a large backup, 1.8T, that i'd like to make a few changes to the file
set.
-- michael
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Tks Daniel, it help but not solve my problem :). Now i'm getting a
lot of messages like this:
##
20-Dec 09:20 OpBackup JobId 33395: Start Backup JobId 33395,
Job=net-server.2007-12-20_01.00.22
20-Dec 09:20 OpBackup JobId 33381: Fatal error: Network erro
40 matches
Mail list logo
