Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread Koldo Santisteban
Yes that´s true. For that reason, i think, It is very interesting that people share their experience about Windows 2008. I have mixed systems, linux centos, RedHat, Debian, windows 2000, Windows 2003 and now , of course, windows 2008. I think that this is the situation of many people and is very in

Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Richard Scobie
Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > I think I'll hold off updating for a bit longer. Sigh. I have just discovered the issue of bat being unusably slow restoring on 5.0.X is known about by the developers and is being worked on. Regards, Richard ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Richard Scobie
Gary R. Schmidt wrote: > I think I'll hold off updating for a bit longer. Sigh. Another bat bug I have just discovered going from 3.0.3 to 5.0.2, is mounting tapes in an autochanger from the command window: bat output in console pane: mount Select Storage resource (1-3): Automatically selecte

Re: [Bacula-users] [Maybe OT] 5.0.2 & PostgreSQL 8.4.3: Disk space requirements

2010-05-12 Thread Lampzy
Holger, One thing to try is to put Bacula's working directory on a bigger file system. If you have spooling enabled (which you probably have) the working directory is where Bacula spools attributes i.e. the data it needs to save in the database and if you backup a lot of files this directory c

Re: [Bacula-users] Restores via bat version browser very slow.

2010-05-12 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On Wed, May 12, 2010 13:56, Richard Scobie wrote: > I installed 3.0.3 a month or so prior to 5.0.0 being released, with a > view to using bat for restores, as it made life much easier for > commandline-phobes, and it performed very well. > > It was then updated to 5.0.1 and restores of anything mor

[Bacula-users] Verify Job Error

2010-05-12 Thread ikkysleepy
> > Do you have Incremental in the schedule definition? You probably need a > separate schedule for the verify jobs with no Level specified. > Great removing the level in the schedule worked. Thanks! +-- |This was sent by

[Bacula-users] Feature request / Enhancement, Item 3: Scheduling syntax that permits more flexibility and options

2010-05-12 Thread Olaf Zevenboom
Enhancement to: Item 3: Scheduling syntax that permits more flexibility and options Date: 15 December 2006 Origin: Gregory Brauer (greg at wildbrain dot com) and Florian Schnabel Status: (see: http://bacula.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=bacula/bacula;a=blob;f=bacula/projects;hb=HEAD ) W

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread Sean M Clark
On 2010May12 2:42 AM, frank cheong wrote: > Dear All, > > I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in > backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I > add a second client :- > > Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May >

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread Josh Fisher
On 5/12/2010 3:42 AM, frank cheong wrote: > Dear All, > > I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in > backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I > add a second client :- > > Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May >

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bulk] Re: Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread James Harper
> > > Foo, could you explain wich product is "ADS"?? is open source? > > It stands for Automated Desployment Service (and by now has been replaced > by WDS, where W=Windows), you should be able to download it somewhere off > the M$ site. > Microsoft and their acronyms. I would have said that A

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, On Wed, 12 May 2010, Kevin Keane wrote: > Because Windows Backup goes down to the sector or block level, it can > back up basically anything that is on your hard disk - Exchange, SQL > Server, virtual machines, registries, active directory, junction points, > case-sensitive files, files with

[Bacula-users] [Maybe OT] 5.0.2 & PostgreSQL 8.4.3: Disk space requirements

2010-05-12 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi, I'm getting the following error from Bacula (or rather my PostgreSQL installation): === 12-Mai 06:28 nathan-dir JobId 15: Fatal error: Catalog error creating JobMedia record. sql_create.c:145 Create JobMedia record INSERT INTO JobMedia (JobId,MediaId,FirstIndex,LastIndex,StartFile,EndFile,St

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread Kevin Keane
> -Original Message- > From: Foo [mailto:bfo...@yahoo.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2010 3:21 AM > To: Kevin Keane; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup > > On Wed, 12 May 2010 06:51:42 +0200, Kevin Keane > > wrote: > >

[Bacula-users] Mail error: bsmtp cannot find libbac-5.0.1.so after upgrade from 3.0.3 to 5.0.2

2010-05-12 Thread Foo
Just a FYI if someone else runs into this: after upgrading from 2.4.3 to 3.0.3 and then to 5.0.2 I'm getting (ironically) the following mail from logcheck: May 12 11:45:10 HOSTNAME bacula-dir: 12-May 11:45 Message delivery ERROR: Mail prog: /sbin/bsmtp: error while loading shared libraries:

[Bacula-users] Volume in Status error after cancelling a job (5.0.2)

2010-05-12 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, each time I cancel a backup job, the next job bound for that volume on which the cancelled job ran Bacula marks the volume in error with a "file count mismatch". I don't recall bad behaviour like this from previous versions (mainly 2.4 and 3.0.x), so is this a bug or a feature? Is it s

[Bacula-users] Bacula report email

2010-05-12 Thread aspenbr
Hello The Bacula allow send report about jobs backup by e-mail services, but I haven't founded any documentation about this. Somebody can show me link about this service . Thanks +-- |This was sent by aspe...@gmail.com via B

Re: [Bacula-users] Database version problems caused Ubuntu 10.04 upgrade to abort

2010-05-12 Thread Foo
On Wed, 12 May 2010 00:15:53 +0200, David Edwards wrote: > Hi. I ran the Ubuntu 10.04 upgrade the other day (from 9.10) and it fell > over at the bacula update stage. It was complaining about the database. > > So I'm guessing the DB upgrade hasn't worked. > > I've downloaded the 3.0.3 and 5.0

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread Foo
On Wed, 12 May 2010 06:51:42 +0200, Kevin Keane wrote: > The "system state" in Windows 2008 is really the whole C: drive plus a > little extra information (I assume, boot sectors or the like). Do you know if they have a replacement for ntbackup or a similar tool that does the same thing? I

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bulk] Re: Windows 2008/2008r2 Server backup

2010-05-12 Thread Foo
On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:59:32 +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote: > Foo, could you explain wich product is "ADS"?? is open source? It stands for Automated Desployment Service (and by now has been replaced by WDS, where W=Windows), you should be able to download it somewhere off the M$ site. I

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] feature request for better support of vacation/holiday scheduling

2010-05-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
Hello, Although it would be useful to have vacation schedules directly in Bacula, your Feature Request doesn't explain in a way that can be implemented what you really want as there is no common definition of what a holiday/vacation and you do not specify how this should be handled. In additio

Re: [Bacula-users] 5.0.2 on Debian Lenny: DIR, FD, SD all on the same host, TCP keepalive enabled, nevertheless "Connection reset by peer" error

2010-05-12 Thread Holger Rauch
Hi Jose, there's no packet filtering configured on any of the involved machines. Proof: === iptables -L Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination Chain OU

Re: [Bacula-users] Building BAT bombs

2010-05-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:47:51 + (UTC), Jonathan M Prigot said: > > I downloaded/installed qt-devel-3.3.3-16.el4.x86_64. I did not see the include > directory. By the way, I am building BAT fro the source RPM if that makes a > difference. Using the source RPM is fine. The problem is that

[Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.2 sd bind to 0.0.0.0 and respond only to localhost

2010-05-12 Thread frank cheong
Dear All, I have just finished setting up bacula 5.0.2 and have no problem in backing up local host, while it complained the following error when I add a second client :- Fatal error: Failed to connect to Storage daemon: server:9103 12-May 12:41 server-dir JobId 17: Fatal error: Bad response to S